 Yes of course books are better than
websites.
We don't need to click on buttons
just to be told we need to buy that
book at so & so shop.
We can read books even in flights.
No electricity(or battery power in
case of laptops) needed to read
books,
we can read book in any
position(i.e, sitting, standing) &
so much more.
Books are definitely better than
websites-EASY TO HOLD ON & USER
FRIENDLY(DOEN'T THAT MATTERS).
|
 16 May 2008 20:49
|
|
|
|
|
|

 People have been mastering the
knowledges through books for many
centuries. Recently, the advent of
Internet brings the enormous
effects on mankind.More and more
people get the information by
various websites which is
convenient.But I still think books
are better than websites in terms
of mastering the knowledge because
usually people are more patient
studying ky books. But when it
comes to websites, it's totally
different,people only browse the
news through the websites.They
don't want to get the knowledge in
a virtual way which can't taken
with here and there.
|
 05 May 2008 09:23
|
|
|
|
|
|

 Websites are possibly more
instantly updated, nevertheless the
printed word allows you to keep
going back to it. You can keep an
eye out for new editions if you are
worried about them being
up-to-date. As for accuracy, to get
into print a book at least needs to
be proof-read once, and has
probably also been edited, and with
a forward by someone notable for
their knowledge in the subject
matter. Websites do not
necessarily have any of these
checks.
|
 04 May 2008 17:19
|
|
|
|
|
|
 I say that books are definitely the
better resource. Plus it doesn't
bug your mind, and no stupid adds
about cars and food :P
|
 03 May 2008 15:23
|
|
|
|
|
|
 I agree, some of the websites
contain wrong or incomplete
information
|
 03 May 2008 15:21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 No. The Internet has pretty much
anything you can think of. Just
goggle it. It is incredibly
sufficient in gathering knowledge.
|
 18 Jun 2008 05:48
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Yeah, but books are full of lies,
too!
|
 31 May 2008 22:18
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Follow this:
1)Go to wiped or Google.
2)Type in any name or thing.
3) Press enter please.
4) Now after all that stuff show up
tell me which is better.
|
 30 Jul 2008 15:07
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Internet is always better for me
cuz sometimes i feel like bored
when i read a book while internet
is colorful with more info, etc!
|
 07 Jul 2008 17:23
|
|
|
|
|
|
 I don't think that
i agree that books had knowledge
that even websites does not have
but, it is easy to search a website
than a book!!
|
 18 Jun 2008 05:46
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Books are a good source of
information but the internet is so
easy to find out information and
fast. JUST READ A COUPLE OF SITES
SO YOU WILL NOT BE FOOLED.
|
 07 May 2008 17:40
|
|
|
|
|
|
 Books may be a good source for
information, but they're not
necessarily the best.
Websites could contain invalid
information, but are also a fast
and easier way to research
subjects. Most people post their
information now on websites because
of the internet's growing
popularity. For example,
Blurtit.
Books may be outdated, or unclear
in answering your question.
I'm a google lover myself.
|
 03 May 2008 18:47
|
|
|
|
|
|
 I can't really say which one is
more accurate. However, the website
provides more up-to-date things.
Books can be published 10 years ago
and be accurate, but it might be
"out of style."
|
 03 May 2008 18:16
|
|
|
|
|
|
 I think that in general the web is
the best and fastest way to get
information, and if you think it is
wrong there are always several
sites you can go to and double
check. It is fast because you can
search for a certain item and not
have to read a lot of info in a
book to find what your looking for.
|
 03 May 2008 04:28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|