 If what is reported is true? I
would say maybe after rehab. She is
like the women who chooses to have
and breast feed her baby! Then when
the baby is hungry and wants to be
SHY and NOT feed HER BABY! I'm a
cowboy and believe the child comes
first, the other second, and
yourself comes last!
She needs to learn this very thing
First! :) :) |
 03 Oct 2007 21:24
|
|
Yes- after all if it were me or you
or other ordinary people, we'd have
lost our kids and would have had to
really work and fight to get them
back, and not use the millions of
$$$ to hire attorneys etc like she
did. Just because you can get
preg, and have a baby does not make
you a good parent. Good moms (and
dads) do not go out, get drunk
every night, shave our head, show
our underwearless booty and all
that. No, we are at home with our
families, watching tv, doing
homework, eating dinner, and
spending time together- putting our
kids first before ourselves. |
15 Sep 2008 03:42
|
|
Yes because who knows what she
might have done to them. But it is
good that she got some her rights
back though. Its nice to see and
hear that she is getting better. |
18 Jul 2008 01:41
|
|
Yes she had no business with
children acting the way she did.
Maybe this will teach her to be
more responsible. |
20 Jun 2008 16:25
|
|
She persistantly continues to act
like a child. And last I checked,
children can't be raise by
children. I think she still puts
herself first.
Partying won't put food on the
table. |
10 Jun 2008 03:36
|
|
Britney is incapable, incompetent,
and out of control. If she reforms,
she'll get to be with her babes
again. Hope so.. |
24 May 2008 20:51
by  Guest |
|
I just don't think she is a fit
parent on anyone's scale. No if she
can prove for an extended time that
she is capable of caring for her
children more power to her given
back. But until then i think the
courts made the right choice. |
22 May 2008 21:14
|
|
Britney spears does not deserve to
even have children! I think that
she just wants attention and all
this bipolar shyt is just a way of
giving her an excuse and she will
do anything for attention even if
it means losing her own kids |
05 May 2008 10:50
|
|
Of course, because she is not a
good example,even a good mother for
her children. |
26 Mar 2008 12:24
|
|
Yes she need to get rid of those
children but i am 11 and britney is
bad!! |
05 Mar 2008 19:13
|
|
HELL YES Britney is the worst
parent ever shes a crack
addict!!!!!!!!! |
28 Feb 2008 05:35
|
|
I think she needs to go away to an
little island and relax for a month
or two(paparazzi free) !!! Come
back and focus on getting her kids
back!! |
12 Feb 2008 15:37
|
|
There is more than one of these
debates out there. Yes, if we
listen and agree with the media.
She appears that she is putting her
kids in harms way and if I found
that my ex was doing that to my
kids, I would have the state step
in and grant me full custody too.
Of course, there are so many things
we do not know so, who are we to
judge. |
28 Nov 2007 07:00
|
|
I think she deserved to lose her
children.Especially after all the
reports about how carelessly she
handled her children came out.If
she can improve herself then maybe
she should get a second chance |
20 Oct 2007 11:23
|
|
Yes, if their placed in a better
enviorment |
13 Oct 2007 12:36
|
|
Yes! Until she can SHAPE UP her
kids should be in someone elses
care! To many celebrities end up
with messed up kids because they
lack control! It is about time that
we (THE AMERICAN PUBLIC) have had
enough! If you are a parent then be
one if NOT then you should not
raise your kids! |
05 Oct 2007 01:55
|
|
Yes that is fair because to say it
is not is like saying that its ok
to put the life of the children at
risk and givig them to her out of
her pitty!!! |
03 Oct 2007 22:01
|
|
|
|
 No, That is what messed her up in
the first place.. If the court had
not of awarded custody to Kevin
Federline, Britney would be just
fine! She wouldn't be all messed up
the way she is!! |
06 Jul 2008 23:22
|
|
A lioness should always be with her
cubs. |
05 May 2008 14:41
|
|
Almost nobody deserves to lose her
children. She is going through a
lot right now and all you @$$e$ who
says she deserves to lose her only
meaning in this world know nothing
about what its like to lose
something you love and have nothing
better to do than sit at the
computer and eat Cheetos and write
slander about other people who are
different and suffering! Suck on
that!!!@! |
05 May 2008 10:55
|
|
No, she did not. Their are worse
mothers than her. She did not
intentionally cause them harm. She
just has too much of the paparazzi
on her tail to think straight |
22 Mar 2008 11:16
|
|
I think it's not for us to say. We
really do not know the details of
her life; we only know what the
media prints. |
16 Feb 2008 03:32
|
|
She will ALWAYS be their mother.
She is capable of overcoming. The
most comforting point here is that
we all are capable of positive
change. Encouragement & support
helps in many ways. |
12 Feb 2008 23:53
|
|
No, nobody deserves to lose their
kids and imagine if it happened to
you. There is a lot going on in her
life and with a little rehab she
could be back to the same old
Brittney we've always loved. Plus
you can't believe everything that
the media says. Sometimes they
misinterpret things and the truth
is messed up. |
12 Jan 2008 16:17
|
|
NO one should have their kids taken
away from them. She is going thru a
lot right now she got married had a
baby, broke up with hubby and had
another baby. She has never had a
chance to enjoy being married with
kids. On top of that the popo keep
following her and taking pictures.
She has no privacy no time to enjoy
being normal. I am not a brittany
fan but i am a mother who loves her
kids! All she is sometime in rehad
along with some motherly love. |
28 Nov 2007 02:27
|
|
All i have heard and not alot is
that she has nasty turns and even
though its not good its not the
worst!!!!!! But saying that its
still not good for the children! I
have voted against because i think
it would be an insult to the
children who suffer from domestic
violence and are not saved!!! Wb
ema xxx this seems to me as if its
a personal revenge not a serious
case but hey |
26 Nov 2007 21:04
|
|
I just think of it like
this....there are sooo many parents
out there that are just as bad or
worse of parents as Brittany is,
but somehow they still have their
kids. I just think that because
she's in the spotlight that she's
critiqued for everything may it be
big or small, that she does. I will
agree that she's going through some
rough times and she needs to get it
together, but do you really think
Kevin is a better parent??? I just
don't think that it's up to us, the
general public, to tell someone how
to raise their children. But if
she's a bad off as the tabloids and
television make her out to be then
the kids might just be better off
until she gets it together. |
05 Oct 2007 05:02
|
|
No i dont believe she should lose
her children .I just think she
should shape up. |
03 Oct 2007 22:47
|
|
|
|
