
Going against the amore01 approach,
there really is no debate here. You
ask if I believe something and I
answer. If you would liek further
detail, then you should state that
in your debate explanation text as
some people just want to see if
their thoughts are in line with
others without all the
reasoning.
But then again, going along with
amore01, Clemmons has his career at
stake. If someone told you that you
gained some achievement only by
using some sort of assistance and
the remainder of your career and
any additional achievements that
would come from the initial goal
would all be lost. Would you not
dispute the claim even though it
may be totally true. You livelyhood
is dependant on it.