 I agree with devinsbabe. I have two
friends (at the age of 12) and all
they do is give each other hugs,
say high in the hallways and give
each other presents. That's not
harmful is it?
|
 02 Dec 2007 23:49
|
|
 I mean just because you start
dating doesn't mean that you are
going to do anything.. They might
not even go anywhere for a couple
of months. If i had to wait till
high school i would kill my
parents. Boys and girls starting
each other at a lot younger age
then they used to but that doesn't
mean anything.
|
 02 Dec 2007 14:01
|
|

 I think that middle schoolers
should understand that parents have
the right to know what is going on
at all times and that their dating
privileges can be taken away if
they behave childish, lie, break
rules, or if the relationship is
getting too serious. When I was 11,
I was allowed to spend time with a
girl I had a crush on that summer.
We knew we liked eachother and
would often be at the pool in the
health club where my mom worked. My
mom said she was cute, knew she was
13, and didn't mind if we wanted to
hold hands. We were never really
alone, and I wasn't allowed to have
her over to spend the night or
anything like that. Once school
started, I only saw her once. 6th
and 9th graders really don't often
have much in common, as was the
case in this instance. I'm glad
that I was at least given the
chance anyway.
|
 11 Nov 2008 22:29
|
|

 Yes. I think that i doesn't matter
how old you are as long as you know
you are doing the right thing. Its
not as if having a 'boyfriend' in
primary school is going to do you
any harm.
|
 17 May 2008 21:44
|
|
 It's really your choice whether or
not you're ready to handle a
relationship. Most likely, at age
11, kids aren't going to really do
anything with the person they're
going out with. But I think
everyone should just leave this
issue alone, if 11 yr olds want to
try it, just let them.
|
 14 Apr 2008 09:53
|
|
 I am 11 right now! I want to date,
but I am waiting for the right guy.
Some people might do the same as
me. It's not harmful, they won't
kiss, they will probably only see
each other at school anyway.
Besides, it all depends on their
level of maturity. You know, the
boundary of knowing right and
wrong. You just don't understand
us.
|
 13 Apr 2008 00:32
|
|
 I sort of agree with you. I think
12 is the minimum for most kids.
I started dating when I was twelve
and that was always group dates.
I never had a serious, alone date
until I was fifteen.
|
 18 Mar 2008 00:06
|
|
 I don't know really, Me, never
having a GF before, and 17, is not
really against it. It depends on
what the parents think.
|
 04 Feb 2008 03:59
|
|
 The adults don't know anything
about what goes on in OUR worlds. I
started dating when i was 10 yrs.
Old.(im 13 now). I dated this one
guy. He was awesome. Everything you
could you want in a guy. He was
sweet,caring,popular, and HOTT!!
This was a shock for me cuz i was
kinda chubby, really athletic. My
5th grade year was really hard 4
me. That year ny brother was
diagnosed with a brain tumor. I was
in & out of the hospital until
almost Christmas. This has to deal
w/ dating bcoz he was there 4 me.
Made me laugh when i needed it. Do
you under stand now parents!
Even though we aren't 2gether
anymore. I will always remember
him. I was sad at 1st. But then
finally moved on.
|
 30 Jan 2008 01:00
|
|

 Well I do think 11 is too young,
but I think it depends on the
person. A person should start
dating when they feel ready. From
what I have seen kids do start
dating when they reach the 6th or
7th grade, but it's nothing more
than play. This is because kids are
just starting to enter puberty and
think about dating.
|
 09 Dec 2007 20:17
|
|
|
|
 My response is qualified on really
trying to consider the individual
and development, yet I have to say
I have never known a person of
11-13 years of age prepared to
manage any one-on-one dating
situation (at least in western
culture).
Hopefully, if a child has an aware
parent, they will know and guide
best, but generally, age 11 is
pre-pubescent or pubescent in terms
of stage of physical, mental, and
emotional development. What this
means in real life terms (despite
the 11 year old's urges to
establish identity apart from the
parent(s), is that the child is
pushing toward growing up, yet
lacks the physiological capability
of developed judgment/critical
thinking about their own situation
as yet. It's not their fault--only
a matter of time and natural
development. Combined with hormones
of adolescence (yeah, I know, been
there done that), this is not a
good situation in which the young
person finds her/himself. The urge
to push toward independence and the
ability to make good judgment about
the potential for emotional damage
are at odds, accompanied by raging
hormonal development--inviting a
problem. No way, no way, is 11-13
generally a good time to be
advocating adult-type interaction
in terms of encouraging
establishing emotional (and
possibly a physical) relationship.
Given the development stage, most
people of that age can manage
exploration of relationship with
the opposite sex in a group setting
much better than "dating". Nature
just doesn't equip us with the
capacity for intimate relationship
management with the opposite sex at
that age.
As a parent of three grown
children, and having been 11
myself, I would say this is asking
for damage to both the child and
with whomever she/he is encouraged
to develop intimacy. While I would
tend to look at the child's
development individually, I have
never met an 11 year old who was
prepared to date and
establish/handle an intimate
relationship with someone of the
opposite sex in a romantic sense.
This is a time of exploration, and
children trying to grow into adults
should be givn the space to explore
that safely--maybe more apt for
group types of activities and time
together. It seems to me our
European cousins are far wiser and
more responsible to their children
in their encouragement of this kind
of atmosphere for their youth.
At any rate, maybe high school age
is a better time to evaluate that
potential. Never, ever 11-13.
What a disservice that is to the
person who is 11-13 years of age...
|
 02 Dec 2007 07:36
|
|

 I think that age 11 is way too
young for kids to start dating.
Kids "grow up" too fast as it is,
but the maturity to have a
relationship with the opposite
gender is questionable.
I am curious to know if parents
think that children that age are
responsible enough to handle school
, homework and relationships.
We no longer live in an era when 16
year old girls are considered old
maids. Kids want to go to college
and have careers. They get married
when they are older than they did
in the past. What's the rush to
start dating before some of those
kids even reach puberty?
|
 02 Dec 2007 03:39
|
|
 I guess I'll go on this side to
disagree with your statement. I
personally think that people should
date in high school, when they are
able to handle academics and
extracurricular activites well.
You have so much time in your life
to actually find someone, that you
don't start looking in middle
school.
|
 02 Dec 2007 01:55
|
|
 I think that 11-13 of age is just
too young.I am sure the parents of
these kids will kill them alive. I
personally think that there are
practically no age group
restriction when people should
start dating. Once they have found
their 'THE ONE' they will then only
start dating. Dun you all think
so??
|
 27 Sep 2008 10:25
|
|
 In Gods eyes, dating is the search
to try and find your true love.
Once you start dating, you never
stop.
|
 14 Sep 2008 22:53
|
|
 I think dating should start around
the age of 15 or 16. 11-13 is too
young.
|
 13 Sep 2008 04:25
|
|
 But for the completely unnatural
social situation in middle school,
kids that age wouldn't even think
about it.
|
 04 Sep 2008 05:03
|
|
 At 11-13, the relationship probably
isn't "real" and doesn't really
express love. In my opinion, I
think those dating at 11-13 just
want attention because they think
other people will think it's
"cute." A better age to date would
be around 15-16
|
 03 Sep 2008 09:33
|
|
 In my opinion, you must be at least
16 to start dating.
|
 03 Aug 2008 21:26
|
|
 Oh... 11-13?? Too young for
dating..
|
 29 May 2008 16:29
|
|
 Not a chance.. More like 15 or 16
if their lucky.
|
 17 May 2008 18:26
|
|
 I think that 16 is the right age to
begin real dating. I do not think
younger children are mature enough,
or able to make good decisions
about themselves and the opposite
sex.
|
 11 May 2008 15:49
|
|
 If you start dating in middle
school, that isn't really a good
choice because you have to
concentrate on your school work and
make sure you can graduate and go
to high school. You don't want to
get an F on your report card for
dating this cute boy or pretty
girl. It's just not really worth
it, if you know what I mean.
|
 26 Apr 2008 18:06
|
|
 I think that it really depends on
the maturity level of the person. I
am seventeen and I started dating
when I was fifteen, which I think
is appropriate.
|
 16 Apr 2008 02:07
|
|
 I think High-school, and around age
14 is a good age to start "mild"
dating. Definitely against the
middle-school dating scene. My
daughter is 13 and in 8th grade,
and has done a great with putting
it off until High-school. She has
friends and a cousin who are dating
already, and agrees that they are
not mature enough to handle it.
She has seen first hand some of the
bad situations that kids that age
get themselves in to.
|
 05 Mar 2008 19:59
|
|
 11-13 is too young for a boy and
girl to be together alone. I would
consider a group date for my
daughter at 13-14 years old.
|
 06 Feb 2008 03:43
|
|
 For some reason, 16 is the age I
feel it is okay to date.
|
 03 Feb 2008 02:07
|
|
 I think 16 is a proper age to start
dating, and only under certain
conditions.
|
 02 Feb 2008 19:06
|
|
 16 is a good age to start dating.
|
 02 Jan 2008 05:50
|
|
 No cuz y'all don't know much about
live a at such a young age and just
be young now cuz u are young 4ever
duh!
|
 24 Dec 2007 03:40
|
|
 Well, I'm 16 and I started dating
at 15. I wanted to date when I was
around that age because I was sure
that i could handle it, but as I
come to realize is that it was just
my hormones and nothing else. I
talked with guys on the phone from
age 10-14 and I really got to know
what guys where like o opinions and
things like that. I'm really glad I
waited though because now I have a
very healthy relationship with a
wonderful loving guy!!!!
|
 02 Dec 2007 18:59
|
|
 No kids should start at the age of
15-16. So they can learn how it
feels to b hurt. So if they started
a the age of 11 and some1 dumps
other that 11 year old will have 2
go through crying and being dumped
but if u r 15 or 16 u can get over
it and move on
|
 02 Dec 2007 18:48
|
|
 I'd say 16-17 yrs is the ideal age
to handle a relationship as they
will attain a certain maturity at
this age with which they can
ascertain what sort of person they
want to date.
|
 02 Dec 2007 17:58
|
|
 Dating in grades lower than 9th
(before high school) is not really
dating, in my opinion. High school,
going to dances and such is the
time to begin dating.
I guess I would agree with the
general consensus in that 16 would
be a good age, when you can take
someone out on your own and take
care of the expenses and planning
and all.
|
 02 Dec 2007 08:14
|
|
 I believe you should restrain any
dating until your at least 16or 17
and of course get your parents
blessings.
|
 02 Dec 2007 06:40
|
|
 Um I think "dating" at 11 isn't
really dating... It's just kids
wanting to be older than they
really are.
About 16 is when a real
relationship could happen between
the two teens.
I can't date until college, and i
wouldn't want to. I'm too young and
it's too much of a distraction
|
 02 Dec 2007 06:14
|
|
 I think freshmen in highschool
should be mature enough to handle
dating. I think younger,
middleschool, kids can do boy/girl
activities in groups such as going
to the movies, having dances or
parties.
|
 02 Dec 2007 05:13
by  Guest
|
|
 I personally don't get to date till
I'm 16 but I think 11 is WAY TOO
YOUNG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
 02 Dec 2007 04:08
|
|
|
|