 They should be worn in sports. You
don't want your little buddy to
have an accident or be injured
during sports. |
 02 Jan 2008 20:33
|
|
No, unless they are playing a
contact sport in which they should. |
13 Nov 2007 22:27
|
|
|
|
 At all times would result in an
awful lot of nasty fungal
infections...let em hang free, they
need fresh air. Surely it's a
matter of personal choice? How
would you enforce compulsory
jock-wearing? Having watched a
football match where an entire team
was unencumbered by jockstrappage,
I can only recommend it as a
spectator sport - highly
entertaining! |
12 Nov 2007 17:57
|
|
I guess you only need to wear a
jock during sports, but even then
why make it compulsory? If guys
want to wobble about in loose short
liners or boxer shorts and risk
twisting their nads (or having them
ripped off by the Second Row), more
fool them! They'll learn the hard
way! I know I'm safe! |
15 Oct 2007 23:49
|
|
Not all the time! During sports,
yes we can wear them but not all
time. |
06 Nov 2008 20:07
|
|
Only if we are going to make
wearing a bra at all times
mandatory. Let people wear the
underwear of their choice. |
21 Sep 2007 22:34
|
|
Only during sporting activuty, of
course! |
21 Sep 2007 22:17
|
|
EWWWW no thank you |
07 Aug 2008 20:16
|
|
Why not? |
06 May 2008 18:16
|
|
LOL, maybe take it off when getting
a bath, or uhhhhhhhh, you know. |
01 Feb 2008 22:59
|
|
Most parents don't wanna c their
kids package flopping around |
13 Jan 2008 05:00
|
|
During sports, of course...
But all times?? How will that be
helpful...
They're not going to have that many
accidents |
20 Dec 2007 06:57
|
|
Let the boys breathe!!! Think of
comfort! |
12 Nov 2007 20:50
|
|
AT ALL TIMES! What exactly do you
mean by that? During sporting
events or by everyone all the time!
If that is your debate than I say
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! |
21 Sep 2007 20:01
|
|
|
|
