 Dont loose ur life and make oters
loose thiers
|
 30 Oct 2007 15:32
|
|
 As you can see by all of my
comments to your right, I love
debate and this is a great
topic....and of course I'm
obviously all for the ban.....for
all you smokers out there, come on,
seriously think about what you're
doing to yourself and everyone
around you....think about a child
laying in a hospital dying of lung
cancer because of SECOND hand
smoke....now you can't tell me you
don't understand the reason for the
ban if you had any brains at
all.....well then again, I guess if
you had any brains at all you
wouldn't be smoking!!!
|
 10 Jul 2007 04:39
|
|

 Although I am a total libertarian -
I think that many smokers do not
smell the smoke of others when they
are in public places. Many years
ago people were allowed to smoke
everywhere, as a result an entire
generation of elderly are
experiencing lung, throat, mouth
and stomach cancers that were never
experienced in history before
cigarettes became popular. Now, as
a person I believe in each
individual person's right to make
choices which effect only them, but
as a person who does not like
choices to be made for me, I choose
to take my children to restaurants
that are smoke free. No matter
what my choices in life are, my
children should not have to suffer.
Places where children go should be
free of smoke, drugs, drinking and
any other excessive behavior that
keeps adults from making good
choices. Smoking kills. My
mother, father, sister,
brother-in-law, paternal
grandmother, and several friends
have died of smoking related
cancers. I don't want my children
to have the same fate. Yes, we may
be genetically pre-disposed, but
the heart wrenching way that each
of my loved ones died was horrible,
painful, and they each made their
own choices. I want the freedom to
make my own choices. All of us
have choices and unfortunately for
smokers, their choices affect the
people around them...thereby
infringing upon the rights of those
around. Is it really fair for
smoker's to be banned from
everywhere? Probably not, but is
it fair for our children to have to
breathe the second hand smoke...no.
So, I am happy with the bans.
Sorry if I offend anyone, but ...
:) opinions are like
bellybuttons...everyone has one.
|
 11 Jul 2007 00:38
|
|

 As soon as the ban kicked in it was
noticable. Smokers need their areas
but its lovely not to feel like you
have been smoking when you havent
after a night out.
|
 05 Jul 2007 13:27
|
|
 Yes yes yes yes it causes cancer
and so many other problems and in
case anyone has noticed yet smoking
in public is harmful to others so
therefor it is completely against
the constitution we wouldn't have
to worry so much about health care
and pollution if there was no
smoking if we all worked together
we could stop it as a nation
|
 03 Jun 2008 22:12
|
|
 One's right to smoke should not
infringe on another's right for
clean air to breath. That is
constitutional!
|
 29 Jul 2007 02:45
|
|
 I'm a smoker.make them illegal,get
money from the big tobacco
companies to help those who want to
quit,and for the ones who can't
realize the harm smoking causes or
who just don't care let them
purchase the poison like all the
other illegal drugs are
purchased.Maybe that'll nip it in
the BUTT.
|
 08 Apr 2008 22:55
|
|
 A smoker is like a suisede bomber
and should be treated like a
terrorist. As everyone should have
the right of his own right, they
should be provided closed spaces to
suicide, and all the other people
have a right to get protected. This
is basically based on the fct that
second hand smoking is worse...
|
 08 Jul 2007 20:34
|
|
 Smoking should be banned. It can
kill you!!!
|
 27 Mar 2008 14:17
|
|
 Yea, it should be banned because
my step dad smokes and i don't like
watching him pay money to die.
|
 22 Mar 2008 00:47
|
|
 Cigars just damage peoples health.
It should DEFINATELY be banned
|
 17 Feb 2008 05:00
|
|
 Yes it should stop, people should
not smoke, they can die anything, i
think it should not be even
invented so it should be banned
|
 30 Aug 2008 00:01
|
|
 Personally, I think that smoking
should be banned because an average
of 500,000,000 people die from
smoking each year and even if you
don't smoking,when people around
you are smoking, you can get second
hand smoke, which is as bad as
smoking itself.
|
 28 Jul 2008 01:35
|
|
 I'm for a national ban on indoor
smoking plus a ban on outdoor
smoking except in smoking areas in
parks and areas near doors and the
lies being about loss of business
are BS as Florida baned indoor
smoking and there was not one
Business who went out of business
due to that
|
 17 Jul 2008 03:30
|
|
 It should be banned!!!
|
 14 Jul 2008 03:21
|
|
 Yes!!
|
 11 Jul 2008 12:27
|
|
 Yes smoking must be banned it not
only spoils a particular person's
health but it also effect his or
her entire family.Its a curse
.Today we are all sensible and we
know what r the disadvantages of
smoking ,We must stop this Venom
spreading in our society , country
and home.
|
 11 Jun 2008 14:08
|
|
 I was smoking for 7 years and about
5 months. I was always sick with
colds, fevers, coughs, sore throats
and it never went away. I quit
December 28th of 2007 and did it
cold turkey and have never felt
better since then.. Smoking is
disgusting and ruins your life
|
 27 Feb 2008 22:43
|
|
 No it should not. This is land of
the free.(supposedly)
|
 10 Dec 2007 00:32
|
|
 Due to second hand smoke, my b/f
nearly DIED in the hospital.He was
on Life Support for 3 days while he
was having his Lungs pumped empty
of the garbage that Nicotene puts
into a body.
When he had his tests ran, the
Nurse INSISTED he was a smoker. I
had to tell them NO he's not.He
worked in a Casino for 7 months
where everyone smokes like a
train.
My man should have died.Thanks to
Jesus, he's still alive.Smoking
needs to be totally obliterated and
NEVER allowed again.
|
 14 Nov 2008 00:18
|
|
 I am for!!!!!!!
|
 10 Nov 2008 01:29
|
|
 Smoking kills people, smokers and
non smokers why shouldn't it be
banned it doesn't do any good and
is just a nasty habit.
|
 18 Nov 2007 13:26
|
|
 I know america is a free country,
but i don't think it's right for
smokers to poison us with second
hand smoke just so they can satisfy
a craving for something that will
kill them.
|
 05 Nov 2008 04:17
|
|
 Smoking should be banned.everything
about it is bad and gross
|
 06 Oct 2008 23:45
|
|
 I think smoking is so bad.. It
kills so many people! It should be
considered narcotics
|
 05 Oct 2008 01:11
|
|
 I think people should be allowed to
do what they want unless it harms
other people and when a person
smokes around someone else then it
is doing that person harm. For that
reason it should be banned. Also
what it does to an individual, lung
and heart disease and the cost to
the NHS for getting trying to help
people quit and the cost of looking
after them when they have a smoking
related illness.
|
 24 Sep 2008 20:33
|
|
 White man makes cigarettes.
Cigarettes are
the most dangerous product known to
man.
Kills motherfuckers every fucking
day.
Cigarettes are so dangerous,
it kills motherfuckers that don't
smoke!
That's how fucking dangerous
cigarettes are.
That's right. First-hand smoke,
second-hand smoke,
people talking into machines.
But it's all right because it's all
white
|
 23 Sep 2008 21:36
|
|
 I think that it should be banned
!!!!!!!
|
 14 Aug 2007 21:24
|
|
 I am a smoker and i am for the ban
in restaurants but not in pubs or
bars. I mean i never light up in a
restaurant because of other
families who may not smoke i have
always gone outside and i have no
problem doing that. But when i go
to a bar to drink i like to smoke
and we cant take drinks outside so
i dont think bars should have to
ban. Or they should let private
bars have smokers because its
private that way nonsmokers have
places they can drink too.
|
 11 Aug 2007 04:44
|
|
 Smoking should be banned. In my
point of view. First the smell of
cigar irritates others. It gets
addicted to it we cannot stop it.
It leads to many disease like
cancer,heart attack,etc. It leads
to tell lies and making of cigar
makes people mad, leads to disease,
hey don't speak to any one . It
makes people silence .the smell
makes people's throat dry it leads
to throat cancsr. So for all these
reasons and mainly to avoid air
pollution smoking must be banned.
|
 03 Aug 2007 14:18
|
|
 Ok I'm for it but what about a
persons right to smoke if they wish
.i see a problem in my town with
smokers standing outside bars
smoking and drinking.and some being
a little worse for wear through
drink ,can cause problems blocking
footpaths and intimidating shoppers
.there should be spesific rooms
like years ago in bars IE SMOKE
ROMM ETC.
|
 25 Jul 2007 19:37
|
|
 Yea it should..maybe I would quit
for good then...
|
 09 Sep 2008 05:37
|
|

 Would it be OK, if I came into a
resturant, and while I was waiting
for my food to come, I pulled out
my whole kit of manicure supplies,
and proceeded to open a bottle of
nailpolish remover (strong drifting
odor!) and started removing all of
my existing nail polish? (Of course
I would sit in the smoking section,
but it NEVER actually contains the
offensive odors and chemicals!)
Then, I took out my nail polish
(also strong odor) and started with
the base coat, then a 2nd coat,
then a top coat? The odor would
drift through maybe 1/2 the
resturant by then, well beyond the
smoking section and would certainly
be offensive to many even IN the
smoking section! Maybe even make
some feel ill, get that taste of
acetone in their mouth, loose their
appatite, get a headache, not want
their newborn to inhale the fumes,
not want their unborn baby to be
affected, and have to take their
child with an asthma attack out of
the resturant! BUT... I would say,
"That is my RIGHT! I don't WANT to
have to leave the resturant to do
my nails! I HAVE RIGHTS!!! Then,
I feel like my hair is going a
little flat, so I take out my comb
and Hairspray. I proceed to spray,
and spray untill it's just right.
There's a cloud of hairspray in the
ai,r so thick, that could choke a
horse! More are affected,...some
have to leave. But, I HAVE
RIGHTS!!!!!!! If people don't like
it, they can go somewhere else!!
Does that seem right to all of you
that are against the ban? At least
my chemical contribution to
everyone in the resturant hasn't
been PROVEN to cause cancer! Of
course I would NEVER be so rude as
to subject other people to such a
thing, but, why do some smokers
think that it's Ok to subject
others to their smoke and a
multitude of symptoms??? It;s a
"no-brainer!!"
|
 23 Jul 2007 03:57
|
|

 Yes because the kids that walk by
are effected i did a report on it
and 8 out of 10 people smoke and
die the other to are kids that were
killed from the second hand smoke 2
poor kids us kids friends and
classmates are effected so do not
think about just the adults think
about us kids who suffer with
friends limit it to smoking bars.
That way we kids are not as
effected.
We are remembered by the gifts we
leave our children -unknown is
this the gift you want to leave
us?? If so we do not want it
|
 07 Sep 2008 07:37
|
|
 Smoking is bad
|
 02 Sep 2008 20:31
|
|
|
|
 I'm a smoker. I knoow it canbe
offensive to others.
I have been to restaurants and
lounges that are TOTALLY closed off
from the nonsmoking area. (In an
enclosed area) In that area, they
have a "purification system" that
cycles smokey area through them,
then returns the cleansed air back
into that area. (It's funny, but
that would actually protect us
smokers from "secondary smoker".
I'm sure it's expensive, but in the
long run, it draws larger diners to
these sites.
|
 09 Jul 2007 22:22
|
|
 The none smokers are just winey
crybabies there are non smoking
sections!!! At least there was! It
has to be all there way or not at
all. Like spoiled punks!!!!
|
 09 Jul 2007 20:21
|
|
 First of all, it is a complete
infringement on the peoples'
constitutional rights as American
citizens. Secondly, if the
non-smokers don't like it, they can
go to a club or whatever that
caters to thier needs, while us
smokers can live in peace how we
choose at our designated places of
buisiness that cater to smokers.
Do that and let's see what
buisinesses stay open, and which
ones get snuffed-out. Sorry, I
couldn't resist.
|
 06 Jul 2007 21:19
|
|

 I am not a smoker infact i have
never smoked in my life!! I tell no
lies im 17 and i have always
thought that smoking wasnt for me.
S M O K I N G K I L L S but
you cant simply ban it because of
that in that case you would have to
ban all the other harmful things
around us such as drinking!!! Would
all you people ban drinking???? No
i wouldnt have thought so. Smoking
not only kills you but other people
but i am against this debate as its
picking up on banning smoking not
the bigger issue!! Why do we have
all these harmful things around
us!!! Why dont we simply ban them.
If you ban them people will stil
have it. People still have weed!!
And why ban it because its
dangerous anyway everthing in life
is dangerous. When you step outside
look on the roads!! Danger is
everywhere!! You cant avoid it.
Banning it will not solve the
problem it will just silence the
problem. Smoking used to advertise
on tv, which is now banned as they
say that the advertisment pressures
young people to smoke. But what
about the advertisments for
drinking!! Where is the morals in
banning one thing and not banning
the other???? Sorry for going on
ahaha :P lol wb ema xxx
|
 26 Nov 2007 20:44
|
|

 What happened to freedom? Is it not
a Americans right to do with or to
as they wish with their own body?I
am a non smoker but still believe
in everyone's rights if I am around
and don't like it fine I can leave
just as fast as I came.If their
teeth get yellow with bad breath
don't kiss them,if you think they
smell stand further away ( you
should be 3 feet anyway to give
everyone a bubble )they get cancer
don't worry about it your not
taking care of them when they are
sick unless your in the medical
profession and if that's the case
you get paid for it so do your job
and keep your opinions to
yourselves as the rest of us do
when you enter our work places and
we would like to voice our opinions
about you. Now I think its good
family establishments have banned
it we all feel better taking our
children to these places as far as
bars and taverns your kids should
not be there anyway ...what does
that say about the people who do
that?What about the parents who
have a alcoholic drink with dinner
in a restaurant then drive their
kids home intoxicated...who do you
endanger on your way home ?
Everyone on this earth does their
share of damage in one way or
another.It all boils down to common
sense and respect you either have
it or you don't!
|
 28 May 2008 22:24
|
|

 I am a smoker and i will probably
never stop and it is no ones
business but mine and no one has
the right to tell me different.
The morons that make the comments
that we stink and make messes need
to mind their own business and but
their mouths to better use like
the people that drink and drive and
could hurt or even kill people
because they are to stupid to know
the difference, or take time to
catch to home wrecking women that
sleep with spouses and kill the
life of the kids. Smoking is my
choice not yours so those that do
not like it mind your own
business!!!!
|
 08 May 2008 18:54
|
|
 I am a smoker and for one why are
we smokers not getting the same
rights as the non smokers. If we
chose to kill ourselfs that is our
business and if a non smoker does
not like it then they can chose to
go somewhere else!
|
 19 Sep 2007 04:37
|
|
 I really do not like smoking and I
cannot stand the smell, but I would
only ban smoking from the public
places. I know it is damaging to
the health of the smoker, but so
are other things. So, it is
his/her choice.
|
 17 Feb 2008 12:57
|
|

 The debate question asks if the ban
is fair (gives equal consideration)
to smokers, not how we feel about
smoking. But since we can't seem
to stay quite with the original
question, for the record, I'm
all for allowing private
restaurant, club, and tavern owners
to determine for themselves whether
or not the business that they
established and own will be a
smoking establshment The
nonsmokers don't own his/her
business, the smokers don't own it,
and the government certainly
doesn't own it.
I think as regards enclosed public
places--where people have no choice
about going elsewhere to do
whatever it is they are doing, the
most fair policy is to disallow
smoking.
And one more point about the word
"fairness"... Fair would be giving
the business owner the right to
choose. Fair would allow non
smokers and smokers a the choice
about what establishments they eat
and drink at. Fair means
nonsmokers can and should be held
responsible for making whatever
choice about whether not to
patronize private smoking
establishments and head on down the
road to the non-smoking restaurant
or club where they ar emore
comfortable. (I have done that and
not minded doing it.) No harm/no
foul. Everybody wins then; the
business owner regains control of
his own business tand he right to
run it in the best way s/he sees
fit---- nonsmokers don't have to
eat or drink there. And smokers and
nonsmokers choose where they want
to hang.
The right and responsibility to
choose should be protected and
remain as close to individuals as
possible in all matters, rather
than looking to a governmental body
for mandates or creating yet
another law. It reminds me of a
spoiled child who doesn't want to
be responsible and instead runs
crying and complaining to its
mother...
|
 31 Jul 2007 13:06
|
|

 I think that we should be able to
smoke wherever we choose for the
simple fact that every time a tax
is raised it's for either gas or
cigarettes so we by now have paid
for free smoking ya know
|
 24 Nov 2007 05:24
|
|
 I say no i used to be a smoker
before i got pregnant and i hated
it when people i didn't even know
came up to me and said u know
that's bad for u....well lemme tell
u something its no ones business if
some one decides to smoke, its not
harming your body so why do u care.
They already banned smoking out of
restaurants and some parks and
apartment buildings there's no need
to go to the extreme of banning it
all together that's just people
hating on other people for real tho
|
 24 May 2008 23:47
|
|

 I think it is a load of bull.
Giving the fact yes smoking is bad
for you. You are inhaling smoke not
oxygen like your lungs were
intended to be used for but why
should smokers the real tax payers
the ones that are taxed higher than
any other purchasers in the country
be shoved out saying they no longer
have rights. You don't like second
hand smoke don't go where the smoke
is have smoking and non smoking
establishments according to the
owner of the establishment not our
swollen headed politicians that
think they have the power to
dictate life for the people by the
people that what government was
originally now its all about power
you want a smoke free environment
fine i will go with that tomorrow
morning don't even think about
starting that 12mpg polluting
machine you call a car that puts
out a lot more cancer causing
agents than my cigarette
|
 22 Jan 2008 01:26
|
|
 I think it's ridiculous, I should
be able to smoke where ever I want,
it's a free country right?
|
 15 Jan 2008 01:36
|
|
 I am a Smoker! And I respect others
who don't like it. I am the only
one at my house who smokes(wife and
4 kids), I never smoke in my house
nor do I let anyone smoke in my
house. I take it outside or in
garage. If you take away smoking
you may as well take away drinking.
Have you ever seen a heavy smokers
actions effect anyone, mmm no not
really ! Have you ever seen a heavy
drinkers actions effect anyone...
Hmmmm oh HECK YA!! Enough said!!!
|
 30 Aug 2008 03:57
|
|
 No. It should not.. If its banned
then income for doctors will be
less... Right? :)
|
 30 Jul 2008 14:12
|
|
 According to statistics, smoking
kills 1/3 of the people who are
actually smoking as well as 1/3
from second hand smoke. They
honestly want me to believe that if
I am in the exact same room as the
person getting the second hand
smoke that I don't get the second
hand smoke. There is no possible
way for me to be in the same room
as someone smoking as well as
smoking and the odds do not
increase to 2/3 of the people who
smoke die from it.
|
 31 Jul 2007 02:10
|
|
 I'm against it - if non-smokers
don't like it - go elsewhere. If
you're going to have totally
non-smoking establishments, why not
have smokers only
offices/pubs/cafes etc? The reason
is this is just dictatorship in the
guise of some one else knows what's
best for you, and if you can't be
sensible, then we'll make you do it
(and secretly enjoy the thrill of
bullying as well).
|
 09 Jul 2007 17:29
|
|
 Public smoking ban should be
banned! I'm a non-smoker but
understand that smoking, although
highly nocive is a social habit and
there should be smoking areas for
people who want to smoke and drink
and talk in public places. The ban
is not going to make people stop
smoking, they will smoke double at
home, silly governors!
|
 05 Jul 2007 13:02
|
|
 People who smoke are stupid...why
do you do it.....why don't you just
stab yourself now instead of
getting cancer later
|
 10 Feb 2008 17:36
|
|
 I am against banning smoking. If
you don't want people smoking. Ban
cigarettes.
|
 05 Dec 2007 23:10
|
|
 I don't think it should be. People
that smoke work and pay taxes just
like a nonsmoker. I do smoke and I
wouldn't blow it in your face. But
if I go out to eat I paid for my
meal and want to smoke. My husband
and son don't smoke but they
understand I enjoy my cig.
|
 17 Sep 2007 04:47
|
|

 Just another example of government
governing things that should be
left to the discretion of
small/large business owners and
free citizens. If a business
chooses to be all smoking and you
choose to be there-who is to blame?
I mean does some guy who just got
off a 12 hour shift at a lousy
plant job deserve to be denied his
right to sit at a huddlehouse,
waffle house, or other such
establishment to enjoy a cigarette,
a cup of coffee, the news, and some
fried eggs? I think everyone wants
to be hall monitors at the expense
of our freedoms as citizens. I
mean really! I think smoking and
nonsmoking sections/establishments
should be sufficient. Next thing
you know hamburgers will be
outlawed b/c they make you fat. If
we start down that road where will
it end?
|
 10 Sep 2008 05:29
|
|

 Im against banning smokinsg laws
but i think that there will be a
more higher crime rate if all
smokers are ban to go outside. I
think that if this happens the
resturaunts we eat at will have
alot more loiters outside hanging
out talking and having a smoke.
Eventually it will lead to high
crime rate.
|
 24 Jul 2007 05:49
|
|
 I'm a smoker. I see it this way God
gave us free will. We have the
right to do as we please right?
Well then why take away the right
of us? People say it is bad and all
of this crap well think about it
littering is bad for not only us
but animals, the environment etc
but people still do it. And for
people with astma they have
inhalers for a reason and if they
cant be around it there is ways to
get away from it. And they say it
causes cancer for the smoker and
non smokers. Well let me tell you
what that is BULL! Do the RIGHT
research and you will know this.
|
 05 Sep 2008 08:57
|
|
 I understand non smokers, but non
smokers should understand smokers:)
|
 09 Jul 2007 16:24
|
|
 We are so stupid! We want to pass a
law about ANYTHING and EVERYTHING!
It's got to stop or the government
will control everything! Are you
blind?
|
 06 Jul 2007 22:01
|
|
 As a smoker myself, it's easy to
say I'm against the ban however; I
think having an excluded yet inside
part of the bar/club would of done
the trick. When winter comes, it's
bye bye frequent pub/club visits
and hello to stay at home with beer
and smoke.
|
 05 Jul 2007 13:14
|
|
 Smoking shouldn't be banned and yes
i am a smoker but i don't mind a
little regulation on its use i mean
you aren't supposed to drink and
drive.But come on its getting
ridiculous now we can't smoke in
bars are you serious! Yeah smoking
is bad for you but so is alcohol
and its alive and well.
|
 02 Jul 2008 22:19
|
|
 No it should not be banned what a
selfish thing to debate as it is
peoples vote to say if they want to
smoke or not the law stopped people
smoking in clubs, pubs and shops
witch i do agree on but look what
it is doing to the business and
trade now. People liked to go to
pubs and have a drink and a smoke
and if you didn't like it you
wouldn't go in what about that
choice. The smokers are now staying
at home with a few cans and having
a cigarette without been told what
to do
|
 28 Jun 2008 14:41
|
|
 I'm not a smoker at all. I've never
touched a cigarette, but saying it
should be banned is ridiculous! If
you want to ban smoking. A choice
we have in this "free" country.
Then why don't we ban Christianity?
Another free choice of the people.
We'll ban it because people kill in
the name of God.
You selfish swine.. You make me
sick..
|
 28 Jun 2008 13:08
|
|

 The smoking laws are starting to
get ridiculous. I live in austin,
texas. We have CIGAR bars that you
are not allowed to smoke in. People
can walk up to me in the street and
tell me that smoking is bad for me,
but I can't walk up to an obese
person in McDonalds and tell them
that their eating habits are bad
for them? Interesting. My smoking
makes you disgusted, right? Seeing
a 350 lb 14 year old disgusts me.
Maybe we should make a weight limit
on shorts and swimming wear. We,
after all, have an age limit on
smoking and drinking. Oh, I got it.
How about this, you must pass a
body percent fat test to buy
sweets, greesy food, fast food, and
anything with excessive carbs. OH
WAIT!!! It is illegal for anyone
over the weight of 250 lbs to spend
more time on the computer or sofa
watching TV then working out. No,
no. You may not get on an elevator
if you weigh a certain amount. You
may not park within 50 yards of a
store if you are obese. After all,
I may not smoke within 15 feet of
an entrance. Deal? I can quit
smoking for that gratification.
Oh yeah, smoking causes harm to
others? Link me the results of how
many people GARUNTEED died due to
second hand smoke. Obese people may
not cause harm to me, but they sure
are ruining the process of
evolution. The people that die from
smoking are helping the world with
the Death:Birth Ratio. If we keep
breeding at this rate with more
people coming into the world than
going out we will rape mother earth
of all natural resources. And
besides, it's my choice if I wish
to die at 60 rather than 90 in a
nursing home with someone else
wiping my butt. And yes, my
grandmother died of COPD,
grandfather died of lung cancer.
You know what? They still died
happy.
You think if we don't have all of
these people dieing from cigarettes
the government won't release
another deadly virus like AIDS?
(OH!! He didn't just go there, did
he?) Yes, I did. Funny how things
like that always end up going to
the people looked down upon by
society (Gays and Heroin users at
the time... Interesting.)
And trust me guys, the second hand
smoke from my cig that you MIGHT
inhale, is much safer than the
smoke that blows up from Mexico,
the carcinogens from your vehicles,
and not to mention all of the
pollution AND HOLES IN OUR O-ZONE
caused each time we launch
something into space. Kudos to all
of you that look at the greater
picture, if it weren't to you we'd
all be like arkansas, where it's
illegal to masturbate inside your
own home. I believe that's also the
state that says it's illegal to do
certain sexual positions. Hell, why
don't we just burn the constitution
and start from scratch. I know,
lets get advice from Russia! They
have the same idea of freedom as
you.
|
 16 Jun 2008 23:42
|
|

 If we allow the government to ban
smoking what else will be next?This
free country of ours is becoming
more and more like a
dictatorship.......they are going
to tell what when where and how we
can do anything anymore.
|
 08 Jun 2008 07:44
|
|
 No smoking should not be banned. I
am a firm belief in the idea that
if you are not harming anybody else
with whatever you do, than it's
fine. Smokers do need to use
common sense though, such as not
smoking around a toddler.
|
 31 May 2008 04:19
|
|
 There are know benefits in smoking
most people who smoke have many
health problems, all cigarettes do
is destroy your lungs and put you
at a higher risk for cancer. That's
why I feel that smoking should be
banned
|
 26 May 2008 05:19
|
|
 No smoking should not be banned. We
make the money so why should other
people tell us how to spend it. Do
we tell the drug users not to
use?this is suppose to be a free
country,$#!+ there ant nothing in
this d@mn country free, not even
are rights.
|
 24 May 2008 19:41
|
|
|
|