 ABSOLUTELY YES!! Two people who
love each other should have the joy
and privilege and legal right to
marry. Just 60 years ago in some
US states, and now in parts of the
world, laws did not or do not all
marriage between racists. The
Catholic church and other churches
had "laws and rules" against
marrying someone who did not
believe the same way. Christians
everywhere do not believe a
Christian and a non-Christian
should marry. Nations, religions,
groups of people, and others, still
do not think that 2 people who have
various differences should marry.
When love exists as it does between
millions of same-gender persons,
and if that love leads to personal,
heartfelt commitment with each
other, then the laws and religions
should say YES to them marrying.
All things against them marrying
are based on prejudice,
discrimination and hate. Love is
so much greater...we need more
loving couples throughout the
world. Who knows, if we did, maybe
we would find that world peace is
possible.
|
 13 Feb 2008 08:28
|
|

 I don't see what business it is of
anyone but the parties who want to
marry. I don't understand why so
many are determined to deprive
those who are different of any
happiness they may try to find in
life. Just because something isn't
conventional doesn't make it wrong,
and it doesn't give others the
right to pass judgment on it.
|
 21 Dec 2007 23:18
|
|
 Who are others to tell you how to
love?? But if this happens to
much.....something i realized(my
view not necessarily to be critical
about cuz i don't know,just
throwing stuff out there) how will
there be more people?population
variable in there.
|
 12 Feb 2008 01:59
|
|
 I'm Gay. Period. I think that men
and Women Should be able to marry
the same sex. I don't see how the
govt can get in they way of it.
Marriage is just a legal bond
between two people who love each
other and want to combine their
incomes. Love is love, just because
it's between two guys doesn't mean
it's wrong.
|
 11 Jan 2008 00:09
|
|

 Here in the US, we have marriage as
a basic human right, as is the
right to love freely and
consensually as an adult. Just as
your neighbor has no right to walk
into your home and begin correcting
your way of life, what right does
the neighbors of a gay couple have
to deny them life choices, the
liberty to choose, and to pursue
personal happiness and
fulfillment?
I do not intend to offend anyone,
but the Bible has absolutely no
standing in American law, as was
made clear by the intent of the
First Amendment:
"Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of
religion, or prohibiting the free
exercise thereof."
What say does any have in the face
of personal decisions made by two
consenting adults?
Some claim the harm done to
children, the possibility of
conversion to being gay. It has
been found in court that Children
parented by lesbians or gays have
been found to be no different from
those raised in an opposite-sex
household "...on measures of
popularity, social adjustment,
gender role behavior, gender
identity, intelligence,
self-concept, emotional problems,
interest in marriage and parenting,
locus of control, moral
development, independence, ego
functions, object relations, or
self esteem." Also, no significant
differences have been observed in
regard to "teachers' and parents'
evaluations of emotional and social
behavior, fears, sleep
disturbances, hyperactivity, and
conduct differences.
Some note they cannot have children
and that marriage is intended for
the support of families. It is
estimated by census that over 6
million children live in households
headed by gay parents. Do they not
deserve the financial and medical
security of marriage between their
parents? Are they simply floating
out there, unimportant? Yes, a
lesbian or a male gay couple cannot
procreate. But then, neither can a
man and woman where one is
infertile, either for a medical
reason or because of age. Some
opposite-gender couples marry and
decide to never have a child
between them. Many infertile
couples, both same-sex and
opposite-sex can become pregnant if
they attend a fertility clinic.
Some say society has a right to say
what is right and wrong for it's
members. Society must decide in the
face of gradual or imminent
creation of victims and harm.
Pedophilia, fraud, and prostitution
are all institutions that have been
found to create harm for
communities and societies as a
whole. Society must factually
designate who will be harmed by gay
marriage.
Some say it will lead to immoral
acts, such as marrying your dog,
and that God disapproves.
When dogs have legal standing and
can sign marriage licenses, we’ll
worry about that. Secondly, which
God? Many religions of many
different systems of marriage and
belief manage to recognize one
another, though many claim the
other does not follow the
‘correct God’. Does a
Protestant insist a Hindu couple is
not married? A Mormon of a Catholic
couple? The goal of the groups
promoting same-sex marriage is very
specific and limited. They assert
that a man should have the same
right to marry a man that a woman
already has. Likewise, a woman
should have an equal right to marry
a woman. This does not have to
imply that any other right not
expressly granted is up for
grabs
If the government had recommended
separate form of marriage for
interracial couples, would that be
fair? The Racial Integrity Act of
1924 made it a felony to marry
outside of color or race, with the
judge on the case Virginia vs.
Loving stating that “Almighty God
created the races white, black,
yellow, and red, and he placed them
on separate continents. And, but
for the interference with his
arrangement, there would be no
cause for such marriage. The fact
that he separated the races shows
that he did not intend for the
races to mix.”
The North Carolina Supreme Court
declared that the relationship
brought before them “…is
essentially different from that of
man and wife joined in lawful
wedlock.” They were speaking
about a slave couple. Society is
not always correct by 'tradition'.
Time to take a leap forward rather
than struggling to step back.
|
 29 Dec 2007 22:19
|
|

 Most be that are don't like it are
gay themselves
|
 23 Dec 2007 23:10
|
|
 I say yes because if your in love
with that person it doesn't matter
what sex they are! Also if they
desire to get married there should
be nothing stopping two people who
love each from getting married!
They are just like anyone else two
people who decided to spend their
life with each other whats the harm
in that?!
|
 19 Oct 2008 21:24
|
|
 It think you only live once and you
should do what floats your
boat.Don't live you life by what
other people may think and whether
they agree or disagree,i have no
issue with it and most people that
have issues with it have problems
of there own
|
 25 Sep 2008 04:44
|
|
 Yes!!if that's what they want/i do
not see the problem on this
|
 29 Jul 2008 20:50
|
|
 Any committed relationship should
have the same rights re: Wills,
medical care, etc.!!!!!
|
 28 Jul 2008 18:43
|
|
 When it comes down to it, doesn't
gay mean happy? Who doesn't want
to be happy? What does it matter
who you are happy with?
|
 28 Jul 2008 02:25
|
|
 It is illegal in Gods eyes but you
cant help how you feel and who you
love they should be allowed to
declare there commitment to each
other just like the rest of us
|
 29 Dec 2007 06:08
|
|
 I have seen so many homosexual
couples that get along much better
than the heterosexual ones!!
So thumps UP!! For those who have
the respect and commitment to be
together and maybe raise a
beautiful family!
|
 22 Dec 2007 16:38
|
|
 I don't really see the problem with
same sex marriages. I maybe
because my high school is known as
the "coming out" school so i talk
to a lot of gay people but they're
exactly the same as everyone else.
You can't help who you love, people
need to start realizing that and
that gay people are people too and
not a freak show attraction.
|
 22 Dec 2007 15:01
|
|
 Though it may be against some
people's morals, it is not their
right to take away others' right to
marriage, whether it be same sex or
opposite sex.
Especially since they don't choose
to be who they are. You are who you
are, and you can't really change
it.
Besides, it shouldn't be such
concern with everything else that
is happening in the world. I say to
let couples marry whether they are
same sex or not.
|
 22 Dec 2007 07:38
|
|
 It's the way they feel and no one
can judge them for it!
|
 22 Dec 2007 07:30
|
|
 I'm all for it, why should they be
denied the rights that we have
cause they are different
|
 22 Dec 2007 01:59
|
|
 I understand peoples aversion to
the idea and how it flies in the
face of religious dogma. However, I
do not think the homosexual society
is really worried necessarily about
calling each other husband and
wife. (which are much more
definitive words then marriage)
They are more interested in the
legal recognition of their union.
They want the right to give their
spouse inheritance monies,
property, mortgage rights,
insurance rights, etc. It is not
about the holy christian union of
husband to wife that they desire.
They just want what was promised as
a citizen a right to pursue
happiness as they see fit.
|
 21 Dec 2007 22:22
|
|
|
|
 Being of christian values, I think
that same sex marriages are wrong.
I understand that people are born
with this but similar to other
diseases, it seems that this is
also one. God said be fruitful and
multiply but you can't do that in a
same sex marriage without some
other means of becoming pregnant or
adoption.
I know that many people have other
views that are different than mine
and that I do not dislike people
with alternate lifestyles but at
the same time, it goes against what
I have been raised and lead to
believe growing up and to marry and
raise a family should fall in line
with getting a tax incentive but
there is minimal ways to have
children, as I said before.
|
 21 Dec 2007 22:54
|
|
 It's Weird.
|
 21 Dec 2007 21:53
|
|
 No cause that is straight up nasty
|
 30 Jan 2008 21:15
|
|
 Not cool
|
 21 Dec 2007 21:06
|
|
 Same sex marriage? Only people with
brain problems...
|
 24 Sep 2008 22:25
|
|
 No I think it's kind of weird.
Different sex should be married.
Male and female, husband and a
wife. Then if the same sex married
they'll be fighting for who'll be
the wife and who'll be the husband.
LOL
|
 01 Aug 2008 16:12
|
|
 I guess if the bible means nothing
to you homosexuality is
"normal".
To me that is what it boils down
to, to believe in God or not. It's
your choice of course. I don't look
down on anyone for their beliefs. I
know what i believe and that's what
counts.
|
 29 Jul 2008 10:27
|
|
 I belive God didn't make maraige to
be that way. I do not hate the
people who do, I do not turn my
back on them, and I don't call them
names. God put the desires inside
you, to be with the oposite sex.
Either they were treated wrong byt
he other sex, or want to try
something new, or had their heart
recently broken, but I beleive
that's not your true passion.
|
 21 Jul 2008 18:50
|
|
 The act of marriage is the act of
taking something before God and
finding this acceptable before Him.
I don't see this as acceptable in
the scriptures. So why would I be
asking God to honor something that
I know in His Word is not honored.
Now before those who oppose this
view get upset if you want your
civil unions go ahead. If you are
going to keep what your doing then
why are you even asking us? If you
have to keep asking yourself is
this wrong? Then more in likely it
probably is! So I am sharing one
man's opinion in line with others.
|
 31 May 2008 08:27
|
|
 Marriage is for the purpose of
starting families, and same-sex
couples can't procreate.
|
 30 May 2008 20:19
by  Guest
|
|
 I do not see anything wrong if to
people of the same sex fall in love
and what they do is not my
business. But i have to say when it
comes to getting married i do not
agree with it .It has always been
that way so i do not think we
should change it.
|
 07 May 2008 22:26
|
|

 No. Since when is it that a legal
recognition of a union is needed
for people to be "happy" or to be
able to leave inheritance or
properties and as far as insurance
coverage goes our insurance already
gives the ability to cover same sex
partners through lowes but what
about two people living together
and not married yet that are
heterosexual- are we not now
discriminating against them? There
is always someone that is
discriminated against every time
you try to "include" the groups no
matter what/who they may be and
where. When military began don't
ask don't tell didn't bother to
think about women/men in mass
shower area that were potentially
being "molested" by the prying eyes
of an individual who may find them
sexually appealing when they don't
ask or tell does that mean that the
person being viewed this way's
privacy was not invaded, how would
this be different than if there
were hidden cameras where people of
the opposite sex could witness the
showering if the individuals did
not know they were being watched-
isn't everyone already "afraid that
between big brother and any other
idiots out there" that at any time
their privacy is already being
invaded? But back to same sex
marriages. No i am not interested
in political correctness or making
everyone feel happy and loved only
finding a balance in our society
where everyone doesn't have
something to feel "entitled" to
because they are different. How
about just playing by the rules the
way they are set and finding your
"own" happiness as you can and
being responsible for your own
"choices and happiness" and
whatever costs that come with
those- violence and rudeness not
included but for instance insurance
premiums, lack of marital tax
breaks i mean come on......
|
 06 Apr 2008 05:17
|
|

 I am a firm Christian and it is
considered wrong in my religion (I
hope I am not offending any
homosexuals...I am so sorry if i
am, this is just my opinion).
|
 02 Apr 2008 06:07
|
|
 No way, this just isn't right.
Marriage is husband, MAN and wife,
WOMAN, how can it be right if both
are the same sex? Live together and
do your own thing but to wed is
wrong.
|
 17 Jan 2008 23:28
|
|
 No. It was Adam and Eve. Not Adam
and Steve. It was meant for A Man
and a Women. Not Women on Women or
Man on Man.
|
 09 Jan 2008 23:56
|
|
 Refer to the Bible. Please.
How can you really call it a
marriage? God ordained marriages
of a male and a female. Period.
How can a "real" priest or man of
God submit to performing these
ceremonies when the moral doctrine
he or she is using clearly "denies
and rebukes" these actions?
There needs to be a spiritual
healing in this country that many
are afraid to stand up for.
|
 09 Jan 2008 18:21
|
|
 Men bring the best out in women,
and women bring the best out in
men. Marriage between a man and
woman give us a more balanced
world.
|
 22 Dec 2007 19:07
|
|
 Growing up, I was brought up seeing
that men were in relationships with
women. Now that I am able to see
what actually goes on in the world,
I can say that I do not agree with
homosexual relationships. A
marriage is to be between a man and
a woman. I have nothing against
homosexuals and I will continue to
respect these people because they
are people just like you and me. I
believe they can have a civil union
instead of a marriage, for the sake
of legal issues, because as much as
I do not agree with the
relationship, these people still
love each other and they should be
able to control their legal
situations.
|
 22 Dec 2007 18:44
|
|
 It has been around for many many
years. It is about time people can
be together.
|
 22 Dec 2007 17:25
|
|
 That is against any religion we
should have to through out this
kind of habit from our society
|
 22 Dec 2007 17:17
|
|
 The purpose of marriage is for
procreation. It's not possible to
do that with the same sex.
|
 22 Dec 2007 09:42
|
|
|
|