 Oh yeah. Lots of stupid people out
there. It might not be lust but it
is at least, quite often,
infatuation.. Which is far
different from love.
Love is not something you fall
into.. It is something you grow.
|
 23 Jun 2008 18:59
|
|
 Yeah, actually my parents married
for lust. They knew each other less
than half a year before they got
married, now they are divorced, the
marriage failed miserably.
|
 06 Nov 2008 17:45
|
|
 I married for lust, thinking it was
love. Now I am going through a
painful divorce because my cute
wife is also very immature and
crafty. However it provided a lot
of maturation, 2 precious children
and a lot of good times and sex.
|
 12 Jul 2008 23:21
|
|
 I think they do and it shows up in
the divorce rate today.
|
 01 Jul 2008 01:32
|
|
 I think that is particularly true
when people rush into a marriage.
It takes time to grow to truly love
a person. If it is a big hurry,
then there is little time to do
that. If you intend to spend your
entire life with a person, you
don't need to rush.
|
 26 Jun 2008 17:17
|
|
 True. Lust and love are two similar
concepts than many of the truly
uneducated confuse with the other.
Just like some believe love is
actually a lust for one, some can
experience love and mistake it for
lust.
|
 26 Jun 2008 06:29
|
|
 Many people do get the two confused
in relationships. It can be a
hurtful thing when true feelings
are revealed.
|
 24 Jun 2008 23:35
|
|
 I'm reminded of a tacky joke with
the punchline "until the check
bounced".
There are dozens of definitions for
love and about as many different
shades of "lust", which is also the
German word for simple desire, as a
lust for a faster Internet
connection, or an easier-to-clean
keyboard.
Goodness, compare marriage to a
computer system ... Some folk buy
with intent to use "for life" and
others would rather do a system
replacement than care for what they
already have.
Yes, some marry for carnal lust,
and some because they desire/lust
to establish a family or household,
and then there are all the shades
of "love". In good times, the best
grow. In bad times, the worst fail
or are miraculously tempered into
something better.
|
 24 Jun 2008 10:36
|
|
 Gaurnteed.. If you can blind the
one eye monster into thinking its
the best thing he'll ever have...
You can guarantee marriage is just
an excuse for him to get it all the
time....
|
 23 Jun 2008 23:54
|
|
 I agree, because it's true, some
people do marry for lust instead of
love, you should make sure that you
are attracted to them before you
take any relationship to the next
level. My fiance and are in-love,
we have been together for 3 years
today. We must In-Love, for being
able to stay together for 3 years!
|
 23 Jun 2008 22:03
|
|
 Yes, I must agree. Some newly weds
are to entralled with lust for
their spouse that inevitably, they
begin to lose that chemistry they
once had. Ultimately, they will
likely divorce.
|
 23 Jun 2008 21:41
|
|
 I agree. Love and lust are very
different. Chemistry can be a very
strong lure but you really need to
make sure that you are attracted to
more than just the sex. After
awhile lust fades and your stuck
with someone you may not even like.
|
 23 Jun 2008 19:48
|
|
|
|
 That seems retarded to me. Why give
up bachelorhood just for the
boom-boom, when there's plenty of
action without the need to tie the
knot?
I'm disagreeing only because I
think the average man is smarter
than that.
|
 23 Jun 2008 20:39
by  Guest
|
|
 Why would you marry just to have
sex with one person? That doesn't
seem very lustuous to me.
|
 30 Jun 2008 02:07
|
|
|
|