How does what bush did have any thing to do with what clinton did.deal with the facts as they happened

 Let's see if we can take this from the top.
(1) All of this talk about this war being all of President Bush's fault is just a smoke screen. Congress (both house & senate) voted over-whelming to support the war, as did 49 other countries who supplied either troops, supplies or helped finance the effort. There was a concurrence even in civilian areas. Bill Clinton even voiced his approval of the war, not suprising since a majority of the U.S. Population was also in favor of it. All parties had access to a multitude of information from various country's intellengence agencies,that is except the public and those who chose not to even bother to look at the information before the vote.
(2) The wiretaps were done only on lines which numerous calls being made to countries which were known to be sympatheticto the terroist cause, most of them made by aliens both legal & illegal.
(3) Torture= playing loud music & sleep deprivation (something most all college students do on voluntary basis), detained people taken as prisioners on a field of battle. I guess we should just slap them on the wrist - tell them not to do that again- then send home so the next day they"ll have becme reinforcements in the ranks of al-quida
(4) Failure in New Orleans- Federal funding was supplied, the customary trailer type housing was provided, as well as finacial assistence to those who applied for it.
The real blame was a lack of planning at the state & local levels. The storm sat out in the gulf churning it's way toward the city for a couple of days before making landfall. This all took place in 2005, at some point in time people have to help themselves.
(5)The firing of the U.S. Attorneys. Not much to say here, the Bush administration fires 8, the Clinton administration fires 93.
You do the math--DUH!
(6) Terry Schiavo case- Well let's see, the president signed into law a bill that was approved by both the house & senate. I think that's one of the things listed in the Constitution as a job that's required by the president.
Now that get's us to the subject of President Clinton and what he did in office. You seem to have forgotten the troops being sent into Somalia, without not so much as a question being raised to congress for advice & consent. That turned out real well didn't it.
Seems like the real issue that you stated was the only thing that occurred during the Clinton administration was happening at the same time. Just a coincidence i guess, he really wouldn't be trying to divert the attention away from just a little consensual sex, especially by using the armed forces. We all know that he holds them in such high regard. The little sexual indiscretion; that is not what he was impeached for. The president is in charge of the attorney general's office, the highest law enforcement officer in the land. He was charged with lying to congress under oath(a felony, the Constitution says that high crimes are the grounds for impeachment), a spit in the face of every judge in the country. I remember him one morning straight into the camera & telling the american people "I did not have sex with that woman." wagging his finger in your face as he told that lie. I don't guess we want to talk about the fact that she was a intern and he the president, or the fact that people such as John Tower, Bob Packwood and others were sent packing for much less this.
To address another blurt in the replies, The case that was thrown out of court was the Paula Jones case, for insufficient evidence. It seems that after the congressional hearing on impeachment were heard, that the judge who had made the ruling in the case fined Clinton for contempt of court for lying.Judge Susan Webber Wright ruled that he would have to pay all reasonable expenses including attorneys' fees to Ms. Jones, also reimbuse the court $1202.00 for judge's travel time. Mr. Clinton paid Paula Jones $850,000.00 seems like a nice settlement for something thrown out of court.

 What Clinton did was lie under oath. Which is a felony. Bush has not been convicted of anything! I personally agree that torture should be used as well as wiring tapping. The wire tapping is NOT to spy on us, it is to look for terrorist that is a fact! If you mean detaining people at gitmo, that is not illeagal. That is being done at gitmo so the left in this country doen't try and give them protection under our laws which they don't deserve. They were captured on the field of battle not in a shopping mall creating a disturbance!
The president is guarranteed by the laws of the constitution that he can Can those judges any time he wants without any reason. They are appointed by the president and can be removed by him at his pleasure.
As far as the Katrina debacle, it was not Bushs fault that the local government screwed the pooch.(The government of that city and state were and are Demacrats). The constitution is very clear on when the feds can go in!
Clinton lied and was under oath when he did it and was caught. Never mind the example he became to the youth of this country, an example not to be followed. You and others say Bush lied and he sucks ect. Ect. Ect. But do you really think Clinton could have handled 9/11 much less anything eles. After all we have another example of Clinton's failures with the Blackhawk down debacle.
And what about whitewater and passing up Bin laden, and his bullying of law abiding gun manufactures into sighning an agreement with him or face bankrupting lawsuits of which only Smith & Wesson signed and only because they were owned by a British company. And what about giving the N, Koreans the necessary matierials to make a nuclear weapon, and selling nuclear secrets to the Chinese communists, how about sending an U.S. Expert over to China to help them fix thier ballistic missle program which the Chi-Com's couldn't get to work!?!
As a minnimum Clinton should have been impeached, but was only censured! He and his wife and Gore and his wife should have been tried for treason and convicted and give life in the electric chair! Bush may suck, but Clinton sucks more!

 Mr Bush is simply being the President!

 Mr bush is just being himself.

 Simply lying is not enough to get a president impeached. If so, every president would have been impeached.

Clinton was not impeached for lying, he was impeached for LYING UNDER OATH, also known as PERJURY. To have one law for the common man, and another for those in power is the definition of TYRRANY.

To claim nobody is ever prosecuted for perjury is also a lie. People have been prosecuted for exactly that, both before and after the Clinton affair.

As a matter of fact, a particular Mayor up north is being prosecuted for lying under oath, and obstruction of justice... And what did he lie about? Sex.

 Nxon got impeached for just one lie. Clinton got impeached for a sack of lies.

Both impeached Presidents were guilty of the 'high crimes and misdemeanors' necessary to impeach. The Clintons should have known better, as Hillary was on the legal team that impeached Nixon.

What goes around comes around.