Home Debates There Should Not Be Death Sentences In Prison
There Should Not Be Death Sentences In Prison
For
I Think That It's Bad Enough That People In Prison Have To Spend Their Life In Concrete Boxes Their Lives Shouldn't Be Taken Away Too.
by Heartbabii Heartbabii
 06 Nov 2008 23:16  
Against
 No one, be it an individual or the state, should have the right to take the life of another sentient human being for any reason. There is something deeply troubling and morally corrupt about the "eye-for-an-eye" argument. We, both as individuals and collectively as a society, have progressed past such barbaric practices.
 07 Nov 2008 02:07
by Dogdeeva Dogdeeva
 I have voiced my objections to capital punishment over and over again. It is nothing more than state-sanctioned revenge. It does not deter crime, and it costs the state more than incarceration (but that's not a reason I object to it).

I believe that the loss of one''s personal freedom has to be the harshest form of punishment we can impose on an individual who has been able to do as he pleased during his life.

I rarely invoke religion, but for those who do, "Thou Shalt Not Kill" didn't come with exceptions.
 07 Nov 2008 02:35
by Robbier44 Robbier44
 I believe that giving the death sentence is wrong. It's like trying to fight fire with fire.
 10 Nov 2008 19:44
by Jazzygirl4 Jazzygirl4
 I cannot see cash savings arguments as a measure for purposes of equalizing harm: Revenge/avenging/punishment and anger cannot be resolved through punishment. It does not resolve it.

In terms of morality,the logic of revenge is non existent. It is emotive, not logical, and even removal of the harmer seems logical - it does not remove the harm done and is not only illogical but appears also immoral.
 07 Nov 2008 05:12
by Guest Guest
 Who are we to judge and play God? Thou shall not kill. I can see putting them in jail and keeping them from harming others, but let them live. Some can change if they want to and deserve a second chance.
 07 Nov 2008 03:07
by Ryanna Ryanna
 Most prisons are like holiday camps with tv,computer games gym and the list goes on ,why should they have any creature comforts !! ? Do the crime ? Do the time ? And if its serious enough to deserve the death penalty they should be executed
 10 Nov 2008 23:31
by Beamerman Beamerman
 The main reason it costs so much money to put a convicted murderer on death row has very little to do with the sentence the convicted receives. If anything it costs as much as it does to apply the death penalty because of the number of appeals and the chronic back and forth, tit for tat chess game that goes on between the state and the defense of the convicted. It's not just appeals, it's the motions for delay, it's the requests for clemency it's pushing the date of execution back over and over again until a convicted murderer that should have been terminated 3 months after sentencing has been sitting there for 20 + years with no set date in sight. THATS why it costs so much to put somebody on death row. Here's an idea, don't complain about the cost, complain about the amount of appeals and second chances these people are getting. Their victims SURELY were not given the same option.

And as far as the state sanctioned revenge point goes, screw the state. Why not ask what the victim's family wants? You cannot use the words "morally corrupt" to describe the punishment designated for actions that have NO moral value. If someone decides to violently take 1 life or many, then that person has given up their rights to be treated as a human. At that time, we as a society are no longer executing a person, we are excising a malignant cancer.
It's also true that there is no proven link between the death penalty and violent crime prevention. Then again, if you take that road you have to admit that there is no proof that the death penalty does not prevent violent crime. It all depends on where you do your research. I will also point out that executions and capitol punishment used to be public. I'm pretty sure that if it still was there would be a noticeable decline in violent crime.
 07 Nov 2008 03:21
by Dexys_pal Dexys_pal
 I feel that when you murder someone then you must get the Death Sentence. You didn't think about the other person when you decided to kill that person so why should it be any different for the person who committed the crime. We use to have the Death Penalty in our country and it worked perfectly. It was definitely a deterrent. The problem is laying with your Justice System. We never had people sitting in jail waiting to be sentenced for so many years. If you murder someone and all the evidence points to you then its time to go. If you raped, steal or commited any kind of fraudulent acts then you get jail sentences. It worked perfectly until they decided to take the Death Penalty away, now it is a feast for criminals.

Our jails are so full now that they had to build two more jails now to take all the criminals. Murderers have a royal time in jail. The criminals that commit crimes like steal, rape and so on, stay in jail for about three to four weeks and then they get released because of jails being to full just to commit the same crime and be back in jail a week later. To murder someone here is even better.

Explain this to me. Someone forget to pay his TV licence. The Inspector comes to his house and give him a fine of R1000,00 but the guy that murder someone gets released on bail for R500,00 which is R500,00 less than the guy that didn't pay his TV licence. So what did I tell this guy. "Maybe you should have killed the Inspector in that way you would have paid R500,00 and no more irritating Inspector to bother you".

It is so bad here that you don't drive at night. I had to install security systems in my house and they still got in while I was sleeping and had to put beams in on the outside of my house now as well and they still came back but at least they couldn't come in my house. So you tell me which one is the better life.

Here it cost us more to keep them in jail then to kill them
 17 Nov 2008 11:42
by Tamy Tamy
 The prisoner that has killed whether done with a vehicle while drunk or they used a weapon to kill. The prisoner needs killed as well. A life for a life taken. There is no reason to spare ones life for killing another life.
 11 Nov 2008 18:57
by Usaright Usaright
 I am for it 100%. Eye for an eye. There should be no appeals and a short time in jail. ONLY for the cases where the accused are 100% guilty through admission or multi witnesses
 10 Nov 2008 19:38
by Smhartman Smhartman
 I think there should be death penalty's...you want to keep them in jail?...ok you tell that to the familys of the people they have killed..raped..and so on...you say" aww them poor people living in a box" let me tell you they are living better then you are 3 meals a day t.v. Gym...they all should get put down....O and guess who all pays the there life long vacation...TAX PAYERS like you and me
 07 Nov 2008 15:11
by Rampagekid Rampagekid
 I think there should be death penalty's for only the clear cut cases of Murder, terrorism, and for serious crimes to minor children. The population continues to get larger and larger, and more people are being locked up. We should concentrate on those that can be rehabilitated and released eventually to become productive citizens. Murder's don't value the meaning of life, and don't deserve to continue living on this earth to destroy anything else.
 07 Nov 2008 07:55
by Bbigbert Bbigbert
 There are some that it is known they are responsible for their acts on inhumanity against man! Such as Jeffrey Dahlmer! Child rapist that kill these poor kids after abusing them to death! I knew a man who had a 13 year old daughter that was raped for days and then as the killer stated killed her like a deer! People like this have no conscious or remorse. They are not human but have truly crossed the boundaries and will never be human. These individuals are not fit for life nor should they be given even a second of breath beyond this one! This is limited however as there are those that it is questionable of their association and it is a tough decision but having known what some do and that they are busted with no doubt of their guilt! They should be killed on the spot!

This is of course only after years of appeals and plead outs and reduced charges. Individuals that are on Death-row are there for the better of us all a reason. It takes years for an individual that is sentenced to a capital crime does not happen unless the inmate request it's execution which still takes time. Timothy McVee was the fastest that I have ever seen.
 07 Nov 2008 04:04
by Countvak Countvak
The Government Should Be Able To Limit Family Sizes
Individuals Who Are Not US Citizens And Residing On US Soil Illegally Should Not Receive Protections...
There Should Be A National Curfew For People Under The Age Of 18.
I Should Have The Right To Defend What Is Mine。
There Should Not Be A Statute Of Limitations On Rape!
A New Law Prohibiting Lethal Force Should Be Enacted.
Courts Are Too Quick To Prosecute Men For Being Behind On Child Support.
Death Penalty Should Be Stopped
Perjury Should Be Prosecuted More Than Or As Often As Driving On A Suspended License.
It Is Ok For A Person Convicted Of A Violent Rape To Serve Is Sentence On The 'Day For A Day' Time Schedule...
New Bankruptcy Law Is Good For Americans.
The Labor Department Should Enforce A 4-day Work Week
Was O.J. Simpson Guilty Or Innocent?
Rules Make A Person Slave!
Marijuana Should Be Legalized!
What Is Void An Voidable Contract?
What Qualifications To Do With Law?
Abolish The Death Penalty, How About You Thinking Of?
How Have Miranda Rights Hurt Law Enforcement?
If A Person Has A Conviction(felony) How Can You Get A Job Without Them Seeing It After Probation?
 
 

Ask a Question via Twitter

Send a question to @askblurtit and we will publish it online and send you a reply everytime you receive an answer.

Blurtit Store

Get T-shirts, hoodies, caps and more at the Blurtit store

Blurtit International