I would always prefer a faithful heart, partner or otherwise. My reasoning is: Money is transient--comes and goes at anytime, and is meaningless to me in the large scheme of things. Money is a bartering medium constructed by human beings to get the things they believe they need to survive in a limited life. Money, being transient, also purchases only the transient. Its purchase power is limited and temporary. I would rather be dead than sell out to what is material in this world.

A faithful and loving spirit is not transient. It is something we bind our own hearts and souls to, and is precious, valuable for well being, and has permanence and meaning beyond what will be here today and gone tomorrow.

 UNFAITHFUL! You keep them! They are not for me in ANYWAY!

 I would like to have a poor faithful one. What is the use of a partner who is rich but not faithful.

 This is one of those instances where money can not buy happiness. I would be much happier with a partner who is poor but true as we would actually be much richer in love and happiness than if we had plenty of money.

 I would choose a poor faithful guy because I would be at peace in my heart. Besides I know the kind of guys I'm into, there's no way he would be poor for long!

 I think i would have a poor faithful partner than a rich unfaithful one because money is worth less than love!!! :-)

 Poor and faithful all the way.

 Well, unless you're not serious about your husband or wife i would suggest that you stay with a faithful spouse. First of all, it's morally wrong to be with someone for their money. Secondly, you'll never have a happy life if such is the kind you're living.

 As long as she not a homeless girl i am okay.

 At the end of the day, I would like to curl up in bed with my spouse who is mine all mine.

 Money cannot compare to fidelity. It is my personal preference and many others desire this trait as well. Money is temporary but faithfulness is lasting.

 The poor and unfaithful one. As long as i know i am loved and he will never leave no matter what.
Money is not everything, i prefer true love then a fake one

 I'm for the faithful! I already have that. So my life is good.

 I would rather have a poor faithful partner. Love is more valuable than anything.

 Ive had both i would stick with the poor faithful one anyday,who in their right mind would be bothered with all the beep that comes with being with a rich guy who thinks he is better than everyone else.give me the faithful anyday.

 No amount of money will ever buy you self respect.

 I disagree with I would go the other way.

 My dad's way faithful to my mom but $'s been tight. I still love my dad (as a dad...)

 Money can't buy you love, it can't buy you happiness, it can't buy trust, it does just the opposite. It can break down love relationships, make people miserable and cause lack of trust. Sure money helps until love comes along, but I would rather be poor and happy and in love, that rich and suspicious and miserable.

 It is easier to change spending habits and income brackets than it is to change people so I'll take poor and faithful. True love is to hard to come by

 I would like a person with an hones heart. It is like you are living without a person if your partner is unfaithful. Sure I would like the money but not having someone that loves you would be like torture.

 Happiness and unity are way more important than money. Why would anybody want to be miserable through life????

 I'd rather have a poor faithful one. I'm rich enough for the both of us=)

 To each his or her own, but I'd spend too much time worrying about where, what and whom the unfaithful partner had been "up to" to be able to enjoy or take solace/comfort from the riches.

 I would rather have a poor faithful husband or boyfriend than a rich unfaithful one. All the money in the world could not silence a hurting heart. A poor or low-income husband might eventually find a good job. The rich unfaithful one will never change.