 I agree but I also agree with
Matooch, that a state paid gym
might be very unhealthy and
inefficient. If they could prevent
that than cool. Yes, you get what
you pay for but everyone deserves a
healthy body and if a gym was free
I know a lot more people who would
go
|
 10 Jul 2007 21:21
|
|
 I agree these contracts. All i hear
is how americans our overweight. I
am not but for my haelth an feeling
good, i would love to belong to a
gym. Maybe they should consider pay
as you go gym. I believe this would
be a really good investment to
someone who has the money. Also i
think you will also get alot more
people out to this kind of gym
|
 16 Jul 2007 22:01
|
|
 It's true that free gyms would be
likely to be less nicer . But come
on. Gyms take the P*ss I am a
gymmember and theyr always tryin to
get you to pay for more things you
dont need. They are like vultures.
|
 16 Jul 2007 20:40
|
|
 I wish but who is going to buy the
stuff for you to use i wish life
was free but i pay to go to the gym
and that's just life this is
America nothing is free lol
|
 29 Apr 2008 05:51
|
|
 Yes definitely.
I don't know how many times i have
wanted to work out the right way
but not be able to b/c of the gym
memberships and costs.
:)
|
 30 Jan 2008 18:07
|
|
 I'm for it. This would encourage
more to participate in becoming
healthier. Although, there has to
be a way to pay for maintaining
these facilities. I don't believe
in being tied in to the contract
fees, but pay as you go might work
for some of us.
|
 04 Nov 2007 03:47
|
|
 We had a scheme here in northern
ireland whereby anyone overweight
could get a doctors note that
reduced the cost of gym fees by
80%. It was also extended to people
on means tested benefits. After a
while it had to stop because they
couldnt cope with the numbers. But
it was a good idea and with obesity
costing the nhs so much it would
make sense to have a free gym.
|
 11 Oct 2007 00:31
|
|
 I agree, or at least the gyms
shouldn't require all the sign up
and assessment fees..if they would
at least let you just start paying
the monthly fees instead of all
that up front stuff..they would
have tons more members..I've been
looking for a gym to join but it's
going to cost me at least 250.00
just to join. That's rediculous.
|
 24 Sep 2007 02:17
|
|
 I agree with also, I just really
hate that you have a binded
contract with the gym. Some people
can not afford to pay fees and stay
in a contract for a million years
it seems.
|
 15 Sep 2007 19:23
|
|
 Hi I think if Gym is free then many
people could go there so the main
is we hope it could be free for the
ones who could not afford to pay
for it to be able to join .
|
 12 Sep 2007 14:08
|
|
 I agree 100% everything is made up
on skinny people and the rich. But
what about middle class people who
have a spare tier? And can't
always commit to a contract or a
monthly fee
|
 30 Aug 2007 02:16
|
|
 I agree if they were free then most
of the usa wouldn`t be overweight
|
 21 Aug 2007 03:18
|
|
 We have one of those in our city
and it is great. People get to
work out for free and it never gets
too crowded either. I love it, so
yes I think it should be free
everywhere.
|
 12 Aug 2007 00:26
|
|
 Yes definatley, if there wasn't
membership fees then more people
would exercise, we live in a world
that is constantly telling us to
eat healthily and exercise but alot
of people can't afford membership
fees so doesn't it make sense to
either make it more affordable or
abolish it altogether, I know I
would exercise more if this was the
case.
|
 23 Jul 2007 18:39
|
|
 Oh yeah, its also called running
and lifting water bottles and doin
crunches, do all that you got your
own private gym.. Ha,ha.
|
 20 Jul 2007 22:53
|
|
 I agree, but I think you will find
a majority of gyms offer pay per
visit. For example, the university
gym near me (I am not a student)
offers pay per visit, it's cheap
and there's no tie down. Just do
some research, you'll find
somewhere.
I still agree with you in the end,
a state paid gym would create a
massive amount of complaints from
people who don't actually use gyms.
Why should they pay tax towards a
luxury? People can just go for a
jog,walk or even buy their own
equipment.
|
 11 Jul 2007 13:45
|
|
 I agree with this, if you cant
afford a private GYM, there should
be free state paid for GYM's as
healthy people mean less burden on
the health systems anyway.
|
 10 Jul 2007 14:48
|
|
|
|
 You get what you pay for. A free
gym would likely have poor
maintanence, dirty and overcrowded
facilities,
and long waits. This would pose
greater health and safety risks and
the lousy experience would
discourage people from going to ANY
gym.
|
 10 Jul 2007 15:04
|
|
 Gyms are businesses, so should
charge whatever fees are needed to
stay in business. You can buy your
own exercise equipment and keep it
in a spare room at home, if you
want a free gym.
|
 18 Aug 2008 02:30
by  Guest
|
|
 How would they earn then.
Government isn't kind enough to
spend our taxes more on us than
prisoners.
|
 22 Jul 2008 17:54
|
|
 Who would pay for the gym's
bills,light water,AC,keeping the
pool clean,machines working
properly,etc.SO i think paying a
fee is ok!!
|
 17 Jul 2008 17:39
|
|
 Who would work there? I sure
wouldn't work for free, and
maintaining a business isn't cheap,
where else would the money come
from.
|
 25 Jun 2008 00:06
|
|
 How can the gym stay in buiness?!!
|
 15 Jun 2008 21:11
|
|
 I support the membership fees or
dues, I think they are necessary
for the business, to run it in a
healthy, clean manner. They are
also good for the consumer....I
think paying to get healthy gives
people more of an incentive to make
use of their money and work out.
The thing I am against is the
"contract fee",that initial $200
down or so that they charge you
(the processing fee). I don't
think that's necessary but if it
is, it should be a reasonable cost.
|
 27 May 2008 03:41
|
|
 For the simple reason that people
that aren't going now are not
always the lower end people but
they don't do more than binge
drinking and think they have a
workout that way as they have to
get up go to the fridge to get a
cold one and slump back in their
seat so even if it could be
possible they wont show up as they
would sweat to much by getting to
the gym the only thing free in this
world is the air that we breath and
if we don't watch that there might
be a tax bill being made for it
|
 11 Apr 2008 07:15
|
|
 The idea of not having to pay to
work out is a good one but without
money they can't pay their staff,
or the water bill, or for new
machines or for machine repair.
Like it or not money makes the
world go round. Everyone wants and
everybody needs. If you don't pay
the gym its not going to have a lot
of things done that needs to be
done.
|
 01 Mar 2008 13:46
|
|
 If they abolish the fees then they
wont have the money to run or to
pay wages as much as we would like
everything to be free they cant its
not free to run. I think that
perhaps they should reduce the fees
by all means.
|
 08 Feb 2008 12:29
|
|
 Someone has to maintain and buy
this equipment, pay power bill,
rent the building. How can they do
this if free? Would you work all
day the rest of your life for free?
|
 17 Jan 2008 23:53
|
|
 The fees should remain but they
should be covered by businesses
such has health insurance as
getting physically fit should
reduce health problems and in turn
reduce the use of insurance. Also
employers should cover part of the
fees again for the same reason.
There would be less down time as a
person would not miss near as much
work. I also know some employers
who do this and it has been proven
to be beneficial.
If you take away the fees, then it
is more likely that the gym would
not be taken care of very well.
Equipment would not be maintained.
Diseases such as MRSA would be much
more prevalent as the equipment
would not be wiped down.
|
 12 Jan 2008 22:53
|
|

 There are already gyms that provide
free or discount memberships for
low income people. If we completely
took away all gym fees there would
be no money to keep enough stuff
there to make it a place you would
want to be. I do believe something
should be done to reduce the
obesity crisis there is, but I
don't believe taking away all gym
fees would work. If someone could
make a non-profit gym, that had a
steady supply of grants and other
funding it might work, but short of
that I think the only option for
people right now is to fill out the
forms they have at the YMCA or
other gyms like that and see if
they qualify for a membership
assistance.
|
 26 Dec 2007 01:46
|
|
 You get what you pay for!
|
 17 Dec 2007 16:23
|
|
 Yeah the thing is that in order to
have staff and equipment, someone
has to foot the bill.
Personally, my solution was to go
to the gym at my local leisure
centre rather than an expensive
upmarket one, so it only costs me a
few pound to go for a whole day.
|
 11 Nov 2007 22:13
|
|

 Completely against, Gyms are like
any other business, they are there
to make money! Some do it better
than others and some have better
facilities than others, usually
depending on how much they charge
for their memberships. IMO the
best solution for multiple parties
involved would be to get our health
insurance providers to cover a
monthly gym membership or an
allowance to pay for part of it.
Gyms still keep their fees and
related quality of the facility
while most likely having a huge
increase in memberships nationwide.
Insurance companies could reduce
the amount of claims since in
theory the people attending the
gyms would be healthier. Of course
the people would also benefit from
being healthier as well.
|
 11 Sep 2007 22:31
|
|
 Well gyms have to pay bills too. If
there wasn't fees then they
wouldn't have the electricity you
need to power up the equipment.
|
 25 Aug 2007 22:59
|
|
 A free gym business will not
survive. The people need to pay
for their workers, trainers, etc.
Somehow. Also, there is new
equiptment out there every day, and
to have the latest technology, you
need money to invest, and how will
the business get that money?
Membership. There are plenty of
memberships that are cheap, and if
you want to take care of yourself,
you need to cough up the dough.
|
 17 Aug 2007 01:20
|
|
 And who would pay for the
equipment, maintenance and overhead
for all of these gyms???
|
 15 Aug 2007 18:49
|
|
 Gyms are part of a capitalist
economy. It's a business. I don't
work for free (unless it's
volunteer work ;). If you don't
want to pay, there are lots of ways
to exercise for free! Go for a
run, ride your bike, use canned
goods as your barbells, take a
salsa class and get your sweat on!
:)
|
 01 Aug 2007 19:22
|
|
 Okay this is a stupid debate, see i
work at a gym, and if you dont have
membership fees then what its free?
Or are you talking about an
enrollment fee? And if you are they
have to stay because that is how we
make comm.
|
 20 Jul 2007 22:50
|
|
|
|