Home Debates Gyms Should Abolish Membership Fees
Gyms Should Abolish Membership Fees
For
Who Agrees With Me That There Should Be A Gym Somewhere Out There. That You Dont Need To Buy Membership Fees Or Monthly Fees. That You Should Just Be Able To Go Out To Your Nearest Gym And Enjoy!
by Queen_13 Queen_13
 10 Jul 2007 13:27  
Against
 I agree but I also agree with Matooch, that a state paid gym might be very unhealthy and inefficient. If they could prevent that than cool. Yes, you get what you pay for but everyone deserves a healthy body and if a gym was free I know a lot more people who would go
 10 Jul 2007 20:21
by Ladylena Ladylena
 I agree these contracts. All i hear is how americans our overweight. I am not but for my haelth an feeling good, i would love to belong to a gym. Maybe they should consider pay as you go gym. I believe this would be a really good investment to someone who has the money. Also i think you will also get alot more people out to this kind of gym
 16 Jul 2007 21:01
by Walteria Walteria
 It's true that free gyms would be likely to be less nicer . But come on. Gyms take the P*ss I am a gymmember and theyr always tryin to get you to pay for more things you dont need. They are like vultures.
 16 Jul 2007 19:40
by Brazilfox Brazilfox
 I wish but who is going to buy the stuff for you to use i wish life was free but i pay to go to the gym and that's just life this is America nothing is free lol
 29 Apr 2008 04:51
by Lilmama1 Lilmama1
 Yes definitely.
I don't know how many times i have wanted to work out the right way but not be able to b/c of the gym memberships and costs.
:)
 30 Jan 2008 18:07
by Kate925643 Kate925643
 I'm for it. This would encourage more to participate in becoming healthier. Although, there has to be a way to pay for maintaining these facilities. I don't believe in being tied in to the contract fees, but pay as you go might work for some of us.
 04 Nov 2007 03:47
by Alva Alva
 We had a scheme here in northern ireland whereby anyone overweight could get a doctors note that reduced the cost of gym fees by 80%. It was also extended to people on means tested benefits. After a while it had to stop because they couldnt cope with the numbers. But it was a good idea and with obesity costing the nhs so much it would make sense to have a free gym.
 10 Oct 2007 23:31
by Padraig Padraig
 I agree, or at least the gyms shouldn't require all the sign up and assessment fees..if they would at least let you just start paying the monthly fees instead of all that up front stuff..they would have tons more members..I've been looking for a gym to join but it's going to cost me at least 250.00 just to join. That's rediculous.
 24 Sep 2007 01:17
by Melissa3 Melissa3
 I agree with also, I just really hate that you have a binded contract with the gym. Some people can not afford to pay fees and stay in a contract for a million years it seems.
 15 Sep 2007 18:23
by Grlnxtdor Grlnxtdor
 Hi I think if Gym is free then many people could go there so the main is we hope it could be free for the ones who could not afford to pay for it to be able to join .
 12 Sep 2007 13:08
by Feng Feng
 I agree 100% everything is made up on skinny people and the rich. But what about middle class people who have a spare tier? And can't always commit to a contract or a monthly fee
 30 Aug 2007 01:16
by Itzonlyme Itzonlyme
 I agree if they were free then most of the usa wouldn`t be overweight
 21 Aug 2007 02:18
by R3dn3ckldy R3dn3ckldy
 We have one of those in our city and it is great. People get to work out for free and it never gets too crowded either. I love it, so yes I think it should be free everywhere.
 11 Aug 2007 23:26
by Teshwan01 Teshwan01
 Yes definatley, if there wasn't membership fees then more people would exercise, we live in a world that is constantly telling us to eat healthily and exercise but alot of people can't afford membership fees so doesn't it make sense to either make it more affordable or abolish it altogether, I know I would exercise more if this was the case.
 23 Jul 2007 17:39
by Melly18 Melly18
 Oh yeah, its also called running and lifting water bottles and doin crunches, do all that you got your own private gym.. Ha,ha.
 20 Jul 2007 21:53
by Zooby Zooby
 I agree, but I think you will find a majority of gyms offer pay per visit. For example, the university gym near me (I am not a student) offers pay per visit, it's cheap and there's no tie down. Just do some research, you'll find somewhere.


I still agree with you in the end, a state paid gym would create a massive amount of complaints from people who don't actually use gyms. Why should they pay tax towards a luxury? People can just go for a jog,walk or even buy their own equipment.
 11 Jul 2007 12:45
by Stephen Stephen
 I agree with this, if you cant afford a private GYM, there should be free state paid for GYM's as healthy people mean less burden on the health systems anyway.
 10 Jul 2007 13:48
by Nad Nad
 You get what you pay for. A free gym would likely have poor maintanence, dirty and overcrowded facilities,
and long waits. This would pose greater health and safety risks and the lousy experience would discourage people from going to ANY gym.
 10 Jul 2007 14:04
by Matooch Matooch
 Gyms are businesses, so should charge whatever fees are needed to stay in business. You can buy your own exercise equipment and keep it in a spare room at home, if you want a free gym.
 18 Aug 2008 01:30
by Guest Guest
 How would they earn then.
Government isn't kind enough to spend our taxes more on us than prisoners.
 22 Jul 2008 16:54
by Life Life
 Who would pay for the gym's bills,light water,AC,keeping the pool clean,machines working properly,etc.SO i think paying a fee is ok!!
 17 Jul 2008 16:39
by Panson Panson
 Who would work there? I sure wouldn't work for free, and maintaining a business isn't cheap, where else would the money come from.
 24 Jun 2008 23:06
by Tiggersmom Tiggersmom
 How can the gym stay in buiness?!!
 15 Jun 2008 20:11
by Zexion Zexion
 I support the membership fees or dues, I think they are necessary for the business, to run it in a healthy, clean manner. They are also good for the consumer....I think paying to get healthy gives people more of an incentive to make use of their money and work out.

The thing I am against is the "contract fee",that initial $200 down or so that they charge you (the processing fee). I don't think that's necessary but if it is, it should be a reasonable cost.
 27 May 2008 02:41
by Cabrunet Cabrunet
 For the simple reason that people that aren't going now are not always the lower end people but they don't do more than binge drinking and think they have a workout that way as they have to get up go to the fridge to get a cold one and slump back in their seat so even if it could be possible they wont show up as they would sweat to much by getting to the gym the only thing free in this world is the air that we breath and if we don't watch that there might be a tax bill being made for it
 11 Apr 2008 06:15
by Dutchman Dutchman
 The idea of not having to pay to work out is a good one but without money they can't pay their staff, or the water bill, or for new machines or for machine repair. Like it or not money makes the world go round. Everyone wants and everybody needs. If you don't pay the gym its not going to have a lot of things done that needs to be done.
 01 Mar 2008 13:46
by Pbfan4 Pbfan4
 If they abolish the fees then they wont have the money to run or to pay wages as much as we would like everything to be free they cant its not free to run. I think that perhaps they should reduce the fees by all means.
 08 Feb 2008 12:29
by Lovedup12 Lovedup12
 Someone has to maintain and buy this equipment, pay power bill, rent the building. How can they do this if free? Would you work all day the rest of your life for free?
 17 Jan 2008 23:53
by Bwtsrl Bwtsrl
 The fees should remain but they should be covered by businesses such has health insurance as getting physically fit should reduce health problems and in turn reduce the use of insurance. Also employers should cover part of the fees again for the same reason. There would be less down time as a person would not miss near as much work. I also know some employers who do this and it has been proven to be beneficial.

If you take away the fees, then it is more likely that the gym would not be taken care of very well. Equipment would not be maintained. Diseases such as MRSA would be much more prevalent as the equipment would not be wiped down.
 12 Jan 2008 22:53
by Fdjones Fdjones
 There are already gyms that provide free or discount memberships for low income people. If we completely took away all gym fees there would be no money to keep enough stuff there to make it a place you would want to be. I do believe something should be done to reduce the obesity crisis there is, but I don't believe taking away all gym fees would work. If someone could make a non-profit gym, that had a steady supply of grants and other funding it might work, but short of that I think the only option for people right now is to fill out the forms they have at the YMCA or other gyms like that and see if they qualify for a membership assistance.
 26 Dec 2007 01:46
by C_love C_love
 You get what you pay for!
 17 Dec 2007 16:23
by Logic101 Logic101
 Yeah the thing is that in order to have staff and equipment, someone has to foot the bill.

Personally, my solution was to go to the gym at my local leisure centre rather than an expensive upmarket one, so it only costs me a few pound to go for a whole day.
 11 Nov 2007 22:13
by Salvor Salvor
 Completely against, Gyms are like any other business, they are there to make money! Some do it better than others and some have better facilities than others, usually depending on how much they charge for their memberships. IMO the best solution for multiple parties involved would be to get our health insurance providers to cover a monthly gym membership or an allowance to pay for part of it. Gyms still keep their fees and related quality of the facility while most likely having a huge increase in memberships nationwide. Insurance companies could reduce the amount of claims since in theory the people attending the gyms would be healthier. Of course the people would also benefit from being healthier as well.
 11 Sep 2007 21:31
by Mosis Mosis
 Well gyms have to pay bills too. If there wasn't fees then they wouldn't have the electricity you need to power up the equipment.
 25 Aug 2007 21:59
by Mdb49 Mdb49
 A free gym business will not survive. The people need to pay for their workers, trainers, etc. Somehow. Also, there is new equiptment out there every day, and to have the latest technology, you need money to invest, and how will the business get that money? Membership. There are plenty of memberships that are cheap, and if you want to take care of yourself, you need to cough up the dough.
 17 Aug 2007 00:20
by Shakeit100 Shakeit100
 And who would pay for the equipment, maintenance and overhead for all of these gyms???
 15 Aug 2007 17:49
by Cedlin Cedlin
 Gyms are part of a capitalist economy. It's a business. I don't work for free (unless it's volunteer work ;). If you don't want to pay, there are lots of ways to exercise for free! Go for a run, ride your bike, use canned goods as your barbells, take a salsa class and get your sweat on! :)
 01 Aug 2007 18:22
by Compati3 Compati3
 Okay this is a stupid debate, see i work at a gym, and if you dont have membership fees then what its free? Or are you talking about an enrollment fee? And if you are they have to stay because that is how we make comm.
 20 Jul 2007 21:50
by Zooby Zooby
USA Has The Best Gymnasts
Gyms Should Replace Unhealthy Fast-food(McDonald's, KFC, Burger King)
Should Gym Be Mandatory?
What Is Up With The Cost Of Heath Gyms?
I Have A New Baby And A 6yr Old And Can Not Get To The Gym And I'm Not Much For Diets. I Barely Get To...
What Is The Perfect Age To Join The Gym?
Where Is The Curves Quest Code Located On MyCurves.com?
 
 

Ask a Question via Twitter

Send a question to @askblurtit and we will publish it online and send you a reply everytime you receive an answer.

Blurtit Store

Get T-shirts, hoodies, caps and more at the Blurtit store