This Question is Answered 

    Do You Think Homosexuality Is ACTUALLY An Evolving Process Of The Human Race?

    All the species are supposed to be male and female. But there's sexual diversity and it seems to be so natural. It existed long ago before society as we know it too. Do you think homosexuality and human sexual diversity is ACTUALLY an evolving process of the human race but there are also people who love different and they should be treated with respect just like anybody else, by the way I am gay and not against anyone.

    asked 3 months ago

    Date | Rating

    Answers


    Sorry to break it to you, but homosexuality is definitely not a evaluational process. I mean what advantage could it have to a species, if anything (in evolutionary terms) its a hindrance since it decreases reproduction and loses genes from the gene pool. Nothing against you or anything, but its not an evolutionary stage.

    answered 3 months ago

    New Comment

    1000 words left

       I didn't care for that other guys answer, so I'll add input and advice.  As an example for your topic, many years ago, I made each of my children watch The 5th Element, starring Bruce Willis.   I chose this movie as an aid in explaining gender roles, etc.  I wanted my kids to understand that if they liked the color pink or roses, that he was not what other boys, some men and women too, would label as gay, vice versa.  I haven't learned the DNA factors of it all, but I do believe that from infancy we are trained to fit into societal "boxes" and if not, you'll be labeled "damaged" and treated badly. So, I liked the movie because it shows, as I see it, a highly evolved society as for sexual orientation. (Although, I maybe wrong.) I truly believe that we do so much "name-calling" that we force some people into lives of despair or deaths that could have been avoided.  I'm not saying being gay is bad, but I do believe that society, enforces homosexual and even heterosexual activities and lifestyles through excessive mental and visual reinforcements and then condemns - just as telling a child he is "bad" or "dumb" or by lack of positive parenting (never admitted by the parent) .  Either way, I just wanted them to further understand that if they enjoyed flowers they weren't gay or if they did not like flowers they were not "ungay".  The fondness for flowers is the issue.  Also, a man who wears a dress with roses adorned, doesn't necessarily have to be gay. After all, men wore dresses, wigs and ruffly things from A.D. Up until 100 or so years ago.  Were they all gay or was it the fashion of the time?  Oh, and who creates the most appealing fashions anyway?  ; )

      answered 3 months ago

      New Comment

      1000 words left

      Ask the Community a Question