|
|
|
||||||||
|
Imagine Your Child Is Trying To Prove That She Did Not Steal Chocolate Chip Cookies From The Cookie Jar, So She Makes This Argument: There Are No Chocolate Stains On My Hands, So I Couldn't Have Stolen The Cookies. Does This Example Require Deductive Or Inductive Logic?
 I would say that it would possibly require inductive logic, because it would be most difficult to deduce, due to lack of evidence. However, you may be able to induce a confession from the child.By the way, is the child's name kmo? Just wondering, because I know a cookie thief who goes by that name. |
||||
 |
||||
|
Unrated
1 ratings
|
 |
by
tamarind  30 Jun 2008 23:55 |
|
|
Comment
Comment
Comment
Comment
|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
In your opinon, is this a convincing argument? Why or Why not?
|
