1 Answer - Sort by: Date | Rating
Finally, the national power of a country is greatly determined by the quality of diplomacy perused by the state. According to Morgenthau it is the quality of a nation's diplomacy which gives 'direction and weight' to other elements of national power. A good diplomacy can bring the different elements of national power to bear maximum effect upon those points in the international situation which have a direct bearing on the national interests; Morgenthau highlights the importance of diplomacy thus: "Diplomacy is the brain of national power, as national morale is its soul. If its vision is blurred, its judgment defective, and its determination feeble, ail the advantages of geographical location, of self-sufficiency in food, raw materials, and industrial production, of military preparedness, of size and quality of population will in the long run avail a nation little.
A nation that can boast of all these advantages, but not of diplomacy commensurate with them, may achieve temporary successes through the sheer weight of its natural assets. Lathe long run, it is likely to squander the natural assets by activating them incompletely, haltingly and wastefully for the nation's international objectives." However, this view of Morgenthau is not universally shared.
A sizeable number of scholars hold that diplomacy has considerably lost its importance in recent years due to die development of rapid means of communications which has reduced the diplomats to the position of dignified clerks. Further the impact of public opinion and the emergence of open diplomacy have also greatly contributed to the reduction in importance of diplomacy.
A nation that can boast of all these advantages, but not of diplomacy commensurate with them, may achieve temporary successes through the sheer weight of its natural assets. Lathe long run, it is likely to squander the natural assets by activating them incompletely, haltingly and wastefully for the nation's international objectives." However, this view of Morgenthau is not universally shared.
A sizeable number of scholars hold that diplomacy has considerably lost its importance in recent years due to die development of rapid means of communications which has reduced the diplomats to the position of dignified clerks. Further the impact of public opinion and the emergence of open diplomacy have also greatly contributed to the reduction in importance of diplomacy.
0
0
- What Does It Means By Under Developed,developed And Developing?
- How Significant Economics In Our Life?
- What Problems Do Referees Face?
- Why And How Systems Are Initiated?
- What Is Vicarious Consumption?
- What Is Advantage Of Trade Credit?
- What Is The Definition Of Co-operative Society?
- How Can A Teen Play A Leading Role In The Leadership Of A Country?
- What Kind Of Form Of Communication Is Braille?
- Did Adam Smith's Vision Prove To Be True?
- Years 1997,1998,1999 Nominal Gdp 60000,70100,81200 Real Gdp60000,65200,74600.find GDP AND Inflation Rate?
- Why Is Taxation Important In The United States?
- Were You From Same Socio-economic Class When You Met?
- What Is The Things You Can Apply In The Real World With Managerial Economics?
- Explain The Necessity Of Good Communication In Meeting Situation?
- What Is The Impact Of Computer On The Economy Of Nigeria?
- What Are The Implication Of Balance Of Payment Deficit Over A Long Period Of Time For The Experience Debt Profile Of A Country? Critically Evaluate Pakistan's Experience In This Regard
- How Do Bombings Make People Homeless?
- Why Public Finance In Important In The Philippine Economy?
- What Are The 124 Member Countries Of The World Bank?
- In Economics A Supply Curve Has What Kind Of A Relationship?
- How To Stop Illiteracy?
- What Does Producer Surplus Directly Measures?
- What Was The Most Common Form Of Sacrifice In Aztec Society?
- How Does The Demand Curve Illustrate The Law Of Demand?

New Comment - Comments are editable for 5 min.