This Question is Answered 

    How Can Tobacco Company Executives Keep Pushing Their Poison To The World Without Any Feeling Of Guilt? Should They Be Stopped?

    Tobacco is the most harmful and addicting substance on the market. In the U.S., 440,000 people die from smoking yearly. [ACS] Laws are getting tougher for the tobacco industry. So they switch tactics: Change their company name; spin off the tobacco business and base it overseas so U.S. Laws can't touch them; they use sophisticated and aggressive marketing campaigns to push tobacco onto 3rd world and newly developing countries. (90% of Chinese males, 78% in Philippines, smoke today.) Now they have more lethal products: Marlboro Intense, the Heatbar, Marlboro Wides---giving higher doses quicker and easier.

    asked 10 months ago

    Can't find what you're looking for?

    Ask a Question, Get an Answer ASAP


    Date | Rating

    Answers


    Yes I think they should feel ashamed.But it comes down to the money.When money is involved feeling seem to disapear.I feel its kinda a chain reaction,They make billions ,taxes are paid and on and on it goes.To big to stop,other wise it would be stoped.Money makes the world go round..

    answered 10 months ago   

    Campaign Cash at Work:
    Big Tobacco Buys Time to Stall Tobacco Legislation

    Lavish political contributions from the tobacco industry are helping to stall comprehensive tobacco control legislation, said Public Citizen’s Congress Watch in a report released today.

    The Senate Republican leadership has encouraged delaying tactics to stall the McCain tobacco bill because it would hold the tobacco industry accountable for decades of deceit and will not grant Big Tobacco the special protections from liability it has demanded. Public Citizen analyzed 10 recent Senate votes on the McCain tobacco bill and compared them to tobacco PAC contributions over the last five years.

    The report, PAC Money and 1998 Tobacco Votes, found that the 34 Senators who voted all or almost all of the time (8 of 10 times) with Big Tobacco received almost 7 times more tobacco PAC money on average than the 40 who voted with consumers all or almost all of the time.

    Senators siding with Big Tobacco the most received an average of $21,309 in tobacco contributions from 1993-1997, while Senators opposing Big Tobacco the most got an average of $3,075.

    "It looks like Big Tobacco’s investment is paying off. The Republican leadership is trying to run the clock out on this legislation, but every day they drag out this bill, American kids are becoming addicted to nicotine. A slow death for this bill means a slow death for thousands more of today’s children," said Public Citizen President Joan Claybrook.

    The influence of soft money contributions is also being felt. Since 1987, the tobacco industry has contributed $16 million in soft money to the two parties. These contributions overwhelmingly favored the Republican national party committees, which received $13 million -- 81% of the total -- compared to the Democratic national party committees, which received $3 million. Last year alone, the tobacco industry contributed $3.18 million in soft money to the parties, more than $2.64 million -- 83% -- to Republicans, and $541,000 to Democrats.

    Republican party senators and campaign committees received 81% of total tobacco PAC and soft money contributions -- $13.92 million -- covered by the study. Their Democratic counterparts received 19%, or $3.2 million.

    "Big Tobacco's Senate leaders should let comprehensive tobacco control legislation go forward to help break the cycle of nicotine addiction among teenagers, just as surely as they should let campaign finance legislation go forward to break members’ addiction to campaign cash," said Claybrook.

    comment made by Chopperjft 10 months ago    Report

    Edit Comment

    New Comment

    1000 words left


      They should definitely be stopped. It is the duty of the state to run over the campaigns of tobacco companies. The Government is aware of all these things and government can eradicate this maniac if she takes positive steps.

      The health is the most important thing in a person's life. Without health no one can become the productive member of the society. Unfortunately, there is no campaign from any of the civic organizations addressing this issue. We should all aware people about this poison and how it slowly kills a human being.

      answered 10 months ago   

      New Comment

      1000 words left

      The politicians that accept money from big tobacco to look the other way and to vote in favor of tobacco use are called what?
      If the government would wake up and realize that Americans that do not smoke are for the most part healthier than those that do and the smoking related diseases and complications that are caused by smoking cost them and us the tax payers way more that the actual taxes that tobacco use brings in maybe they would ban it altogether however the other side is that there are only a handful of people that have to be paid (politicians) in order to keep the tobacco wagon rolling so the health of Americans will always be at risk as long as there are politicians and judges who have no morals which is the answer to your question it is all about morality if you have none then apparently anything goes including turning their back on the very people who put their trust in them and put them in office so they could make the hard choices for us. What a joke just give them more money and they turn their heads to the thousands of people that suffer and die to the smoking machine.

      answered 10 months ago   

      New Comment

      1000 words left

      What is Blurtit ?

      Ask questions on any topic, get great answers from real people for FREE. Blurtit has hundreds of thousand of members so your sure to get the answer your looking for.

      Ask a Question.