1 Answer - Sort by: Date | Rating
When we speak of power we do not mean man's power over nature, or over means of production, or over himself, we actually mean man's control over the minds and actions of other men. When we speak of political power we refer to the mutual relations of control among the holders of public authority and people at large. Political power and physical force are two different things. When violence or physical force becomes the practical actuality it amounts to negation of power. Physical power can be an instrument of power but not power in any sense. Political power is a psychological relation between those who exercise it and those over whom it is exercised. It gives the former control over certain actions of the. Latter through the influence which the former exerts over the latter's mind.
Whatever the ultimate aim of international politics, power is always the immediate aim. The statesmen usually describe their goals in terms of religious, philosophic, economic or social ideal and may try to realize them through non-political means. But whenever they try to achieve these goals by means of international politics, they do so by resorting to power. "The crusaders wanted, to free the holy places from domination by the infidels. Woodrow Wilson wanted to make the world safe for democracy; the National Socialists wanted to open Eastern Europe to German colonization, to dominate Europe and to conquer the world. Since they all chose power to achieve these ends they were actors on the scene of international politics."
Whatever the ultimate aim of international politics, power is always the immediate aim. The statesmen usually describe their goals in terms of religious, philosophic, economic or social ideal and may try to realize them through non-political means. But whenever they try to achieve these goals by means of international politics, they do so by resorting to power. "The crusaders wanted, to free the holy places from domination by the infidels. Woodrow Wilson wanted to make the world safe for democracy; the National Socialists wanted to open Eastern Europe to German colonization, to dominate Europe and to conquer the world. Since they all chose power to achieve these ends they were actors on the scene of international politics."
0
0
- How Does Schaefer (2006) Define The Terms Race And Ethnicity?
- Give Article On - How These Rising Of Commodities Put Pressure On The Common Man's Pocket?
- What Are The Barriers Of Communocation?
- What Did Poor People Live In From The 1800's?
- What Other Communication Changes Do You Think Could Occur In The Future?
- What Is Semiotic Theory?
- Describe The Factors That Give Rise To Balance Of Payment Surpluses And Deficits?
- What Is "Global Stratification"? Why Are Some Elite Parties And Nations Able To Maintain Dominance? Do You Think This Dominance Is Inevitable, Or Could Some Shifting Of Power Occur? Why Or Why Not?
- Who Is Responsible For Fiscal Policy In Uk?
- Can You Tell Me A Abiotic Decomposer, Consumer Or Producer Please?
- What Did The Navajo Trade?
- Explain The Role Of Small Entrepreneur In Economic Development?
- What Are The Reasons For The Shape Of The Short-run Average Total Cost?
- What Are The Facilitators Of The Communication Process?
- Is The World Economy Becoming More Or Less Global?
- What Are Some Economic Issues In Egypt?
- How Development And Social Change Are Related?
- How To Shock A Person?
- What Problems Did Buddhism Face?
- Explain The Statement "You Cannot Not Communicate"?
- A Situation Where Non-verbal Communication Contradicted The Verbal Communication?
- Discuss The Moral Responsibilities You Will Have As A Leader In Your Field Of Focus. Field Of Focus Being Child Welfare?
- What Do We Mean By Allocation And Apportionment's Of Overheads?
- Discuss The Moral Responsibilities You Will Have As A Leader In Your Field Of Focus?
- How A Country Can Develop By The Help Of Role Of Public And Students?

New Comment - Comments are editable for 5 min.