1 Answer - Sort by: Date | Rating
In response to falling incomes, farmers have often lobbied the federal government for economic assistance. Over the years, governments at home and abroad have taken many steps to help farmers. They have raised prices through price supports; they have curbed imports through tariffs and quotas, and they have sometimes simply sent checks to farmers who agreed not to produce on their land.
The paradox of the bumper harvest has an interesting application here. Many governments attempt to help farmers by reducing their production. If the department of agriculture requires every farmer to reduce the amount of production, the effect is shifting of the supply curve up and to the left. Because food demands are inelastic, crop restrictions not only raise the price of crops but also tend to raise farmers, total revenue and earnings. Just as bumper harvests hurt farmers, crop restrictions tend to raise farm incomes. Of course, consumers are hurt by the crop restrictions and higher prices, just as they would be if a flood or drought created a scarcity of food.
Production restrictions are typical of government market interference that raises the incomes of one group at the expense of others. The gain of farmers is actually less than the harm to consumers.
The paradox of the bumper harvest has an interesting application here. Many governments attempt to help farmers by reducing their production. If the department of agriculture requires every farmer to reduce the amount of production, the effect is shifting of the supply curve up and to the left. Because food demands are inelastic, crop restrictions not only raise the price of crops but also tend to raise farmers, total revenue and earnings. Just as bumper harvests hurt farmers, crop restrictions tend to raise farm incomes. Of course, consumers are hurt by the crop restrictions and higher prices, just as they would be if a flood or drought created a scarcity of food.
Production restrictions are typical of government market interference that raises the incomes of one group at the expense of others. The gain of farmers is actually less than the harm to consumers.
0
0
- Who Is Responsible For Fiscal Policy In Uk?
- Can You Tell Me A Abiotic Decomposer, Consumer Or Producer Please?
- What Did The Navajo Trade?
- Explain The Role Of Small Entrepreneur In Economic Development?
- What Are The Reasons For The Shape Of The Short-run Average Total Cost?
- Is The World Economy Becoming More Or Less Global?
- What Are Some Economic Issues In Egypt?
- How To Shock A Person?
- What Problems Did Buddhism Face?
- What Do We Mean By Allocation And Apportionment's Of Overheads?
- How A Country Can Develop By The Help Of Role Of Public And Students?
- Why Economic Might Is Real Might?
- What Are Some Problems Wilfred Laurier Had?
- How Do National Income,product,expenditure Work In U K Economy?
- How Do National Income,product,expenditure Work In U K?
- What Is The Average Cost Of Gas?
- What Are The Short Term Effects Of A Volcano?
- Why Mixed Economy Is Important In Uk?
- What Are The Problem Faces Home Trade?
- What Are The Monetary Of All Countries?
- Can You Identify A Mid-term Personal Or Family Goal That You Would Like To Accomplish In The Next 1- To 2 Years?
- Can You Explain With Examples The Concept Of Consumer Surplus?
- Why Are Prices So Important In A Market Economy?
- What Is A Linking Theory?
- What Is Bumper-harvest Paradox?
- What Does Restrictions Mean?
- What Restrictions Are There After A Hysterectomy?
- What Are Driving Restrictions?
- What Are Islam Restrictions?
- What Is A Crop?
- When Will Freon Restrictions Be In Place?
- Why Are There Restrictions On Controlled Substances?
- What Are The Restrictions For Sexuality In Islam ?
- What Is Sony Removes Restrictions?
- Types Of Import Restrictions?
- Do You Think Youtube Should Have Restrictions On What Is Shown?

New Comment - Comments are editable for 5 min.