Which is better for the environment ? Fake plastic trees or chopping down Christmas trees every year?

The total amount of raw materials it takes to manufacture an artificial tree are far greater than it takes to grow a real one.

The initial impact might be greater for artificial trees, but I've had mine for eleven years.  That would have been eleven trees so far.  (I love real trees, but getting them home and into the house has become too difficult.)

Most Christmas trees are grown on farms that specifically raise Christmas trees. It's not as if natural forests are being raided for the holidays. These farms also cut trees in such a way that new ones grow back at the cut site.

As Janis said, artificial trees take the place of multiple trees because they are reused for multiple years. And environment can be relative. For someone who is allergic, a real tree can make their home environment unbearable.

The following is from a tree-farmer's website:

I understand the draw to a fake tree; you can use it for several years, the needles don't leave a mess, etc. However, most artificial trees are made from nonrenewable plastics and most have to make the trip all the way from China. Meanwhile, our trees are providing oxygen, storing carbon, creating habitat for wildlife, and when it is cut down, we'll plant another in its place. Also, they're recyclable! Check your local services for tree pick-up or where to take your tree to be recycled into mulch or compost.

Sounds like real trees are the best for the environment.

What an interesting topic my friend. Good conversation. Valid points on both sides. I never thought of it till I read everyone's answers. I'll be honest here... I am sitting on the fence. I can't decide yet. 🤔