Marian Musiol
Marian Musiol voted up Walt O'Reagun's answer
Let's talk the nature vs nurture debate. Which side do you take, and why? It would also be greatly appreciated if you could include links to some articles that talk about it. 

Neither ... Or Both ... Depending on your view.

If it was strictly nurture, there wouldn't be examples of people who grow up in affluence turning to crime.

If it was strictly nature, there wouldn't be examples of people turning their life around ... Either from bad to good, or good to bad.

Thus, it's a combination of … Read more

Marian Musiol
Marian Musiol voted up Tom Jackson's answer
Let's talk the nature vs nurture debate. Which side do you take, and why? It would also be greatly appreciated if you could include links to some articles that talk about it. 

I was composing an answer for you and was about to begin by apologizing for no longer considering this a debate.  Then I searched nature vs nurture debate and found this on Wikipedia:  "In their 2014 survey of scientists, many respondents wrote that the dichotomy of nature versus nurture has outlived its usefulness, and should … Read more

Marian Musiol
Marian Musiol voted up Ray Dart's answer
Let's talk the nature vs nurture debate. Which side do you take, and why? It would also be greatly appreciated if you could include links to some articles that talk about it. 

I contributed on a very similar question here about 5 years ago. I'm not an expert (my sister probably is, I might ask her). I do remember an article in Nature magazine about 15 years ago that  suggested it was 90% nature and 10% nurture. I believe that data was supported by studies using separated … Read more