Otis Campbell

Here in houston a tv station khou is showing that these body cameras are not being turned on till after a incident. Should cops be fired for not turning on body cameras or deleting or editing its contents??

8

8 Answers

Bikergirl Anonymous Profile

I think it should be treated as a very serious offence.... That is a form of manipulating evidence and should be treated as such.

Maurice Korvo Profile
Maurice Korvo answered

They should be allowed to turn them off when going to the bathroom or when having coffee.  Otherwise they should be on all the time

Rooster Cogburn Profile
Rooster Cogburn , Rooster Cogburn, answered

I think a three strike rule would be best. First offense? A furlough without pay. Second offense ? Disciplinary action. Third offense ? Fired.  Same kind of rule I use here. But to just fire them outright wouldn't be the proper course of action.

Tom  Jackson Profile
Tom Jackson answered

I would assume there is a department policy on this and a parallel guide for discipline associated with it.

Pepper pot Profile
Pepper pot answered

I think they call that "attempting to pervert the course of justice."  Arrest their arses.  We have them being worn here to, another waste of tax payers money.

Virginia Lou Profile
Virginia Lou answered

Dear Otis,

I would go about the situation in a whole different way...if the police force needs body cameras, then the wrong people are being hired.

Recruit truly the very best people for law enforcement, give them the finest, state-of-the-art psychological, ethical/moral training...

...and then do away with the cameras.

2 People thanked the writer.
Tom  Jackson
Tom Jackson commented
Good point Virginia.

If I were a cop, I would be a good cop. And down deep inside I would have resentment that every split-second decision that I may have to make on peril of my life will be constantly subject to 20-20 hindsight.

Somewhere along the line, you have to trust the people you hire to protect you.

Why don't we require all the non-law enforcement citizens to take a course in how to respond to a police officer when they are knowing or unknowingly possibly breaking the law and are subsequently confronted by the police.
Virginia Lou
Virginia Lou commented
Tom...that idea of citizens learning how to respond to a police officer...it's an extremely good idea.
Tom  Jackson
Tom Jackson commented
Yes

I suspect police must approach all situations, no matter how innocuous such situations must seem to non-involved witnesses, as if they are about to turn dangerous quickly.

Why provoke them on the battlefield?
Walt O'Reagun Profile
Walt O'Reagun answered

I don't think they should be able to be turned off.
I think they should automatically record, and upload to a central server, constantly.  And I think the only people with authorized access to the server should be the civilian "police oversight" committee (or whatever it's called in the jurisdiction).

1 Person thanked the writer.
Bikergirl Anonymous
i agree .. for two reasons .. 1) because it may clarify a 'misunderstanding' in defence of a police officer 2) because it may clarify a misunderstanding to prosecute a police officer

If a police office is aware that he is being watched every moment, there is less chance that he/she will engage in behaviour that could get them into trouble .. keeps them on their toes and perhaps may help prevent losing control of their wits...AND .. it catches those unexpected moments that could plausibly work to their favour.
PJ Stein Profile
PJ Stein answered

I am with Rooster on the three strike rule for forgetting to turn it on. I think deleting or editing is a fireable offense first time with possible prosecution on hindering an investigation.

Answer Question

Anonymous